* [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF @ 2016-02-24 7:22 sys_stv 2016-02-24 7:51 ` Wang, Xiao W 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: sys_stv @ 2016-02-24 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: xiao.w.wang, test-report [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --] Test-Label: Intel Niantic on Fedora Test-Status: Patching file error Patchwork ID: 10684-10701 http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ Submitter: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:06:48 +0800 DPDK git baseline: e277b239708a86b4ec17f8df468e76ab764f8f3f error: patch failed: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c:2117 error: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c: patch does not apply DPDK STV team ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF 2016-02-24 7:22 [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF sys_stv @ 2016-02-24 7:51 ` Wang, Xiao W 2016-02-24 8:53 ` Liu, Yong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Wang, Xiao W @ 2016-02-24 7:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: sys_stv, test-report Hi, The pmd driver patches should be rebased on dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 branch, rather than the master branch, right? If apply this patch set to the master branch, we'll get the below error. BTW, open the url: http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ ,the patch title is not "fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF". Best Regards, Xiao > -----Original Message----- > From: sys_stv > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:23 PM > To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; test-report@dpdk.org > Subject: [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox > message handler for PF > > > Test-Label: Intel Niantic on Fedora > Test-Status: Patching file error > > Patchwork ID: 10684-10701 > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ > Submitter: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:06:48 +0800 > DPDK git baseline: e277b239708a86b4ec17f8df468e76ab764f8f3f > > error: patch failed: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c:2117 > error: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c: patch does not apply > > DPDK STV team ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF 2016-02-24 7:51 ` Wang, Xiao W @ 2016-02-24 8:53 ` Liu, Yong 2016-02-24 9:08 ` Wang, Xiao W 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Liu, Yong @ 2016-02-24 8:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Wang, Xiao W, sys_stv, test-report Hi Xiao, Email title is just be the first patch name of total patch set, so title will be commit subject of http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10684/. For patch work report, it didn't know which branch to use by now. It will also be tricky for automated tool to check which repo should be used. Our tool will continually scan the list, and start validation before maintainer set "Delegate" flag. > -----Original Message----- > From: test-report [mailto:test-report-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wang, > Xiao W > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:52 PM > To: sys_stv; test-report@dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: > use default mailbox message handler for PF > > Hi, > > The pmd driver patches should be rebased on dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 branch, > rather than the master branch, right? > > If apply this patch set to the master branch, we'll get the below error. > > BTW, open the url: http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ ,the > patch title is not > "fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF". > > Best Regards, > Xiao > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sys_stv > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:23 PM > > To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; test-report@dpdk.org > > Subject: [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox > > message handler for PF > > > > > > Test-Label: Intel Niantic on Fedora > > Test-Status: Patching file error > > > > Patchwork ID: 10684-10701 > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ > > Submitter: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> > > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:06:48 +0800 > > DPDK git baseline: e277b239708a86b4ec17f8df468e76ab764f8f3f > > > > error: patch failed: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c:2117 > > error: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c: patch does not apply > > > > DPDK STV team ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF 2016-02-24 8:53 ` Liu, Yong @ 2016-02-24 9:08 ` Wang, Xiao W 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Wang, Xiao W @ 2016-02-24 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Liu, Yong, sys_stv, test-report Hi, I see the other pmd driver patches are also rebased on dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 branch (informed in the change log), does anyone else meet the similar issue? Thanks, Xiao > -----Original Message----- > From: Liu, Yong > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 4:54 PM > To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; sys_stv <sys_stv@intel.com>; > test-report@dpdk.org > Subject: RE: [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox > message handler for PF > > Hi Xiao, > Email title is just be the first patch name of total patch set, so title will be > commit subject of http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10684/. > For patch work report, it didn't know which branch to use by now. > It will also be tricky for automated tool to check which repo should be used. > Our tool will continually scan the list, and start validation before maintainer set > "Delegate" flag. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: test-report [mailto:test-report-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of > > Wang, Xiao W > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:52 PM > > To: sys_stv; test-report@dpdk.org > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: > > use default mailbox message handler for PF > > > > Hi, > > > > The pmd driver patches should be rebased on dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04 > > branch, rather than the master branch, right? > > > > If apply this patch set to the master branch, we'll get the below error. > > > > BTW, open the url: http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ ,the > > patch title is not > > "fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF". > > > > Best Regards, > > Xiao > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: sys_stv > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 3:23 PM > > > To: Wang, Xiao W <xiao.w.wang@intel.com>; test-report@dpdk.org > > > Subject: [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox > > > message handler for PF > > > > > > > > > Test-Label: Intel Niantic on Fedora > > > Test-Status: Patching file error > > > > > > Patchwork ID: 10684-10701 > > > http://www.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10701/ > > > Submitter: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@intel.com> > > > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:06:48 +0800 DPDK git baseline: > > > e277b239708a86b4ec17f8df468e76ab764f8f3f > > > > > > error: patch failed: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c:2117 > > > error: drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c: patch does not apply > > > > > > DPDK STV team ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-24 9:08 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-02-24 7:22 [dpdk-test-report] [PatchWork]|ERROR| pw10684-10701 fm10k: use default mailbox message handler for PF sys_stv 2016-02-24 7:51 ` Wang, Xiao W 2016-02-24 8:53 ` Liu, Yong 2016-02-24 9:08 ` Wang, Xiao W
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).