* [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw32665 [PATCH 05/14] net/sfc/base: control RxQ scatter using flag instead of type
@ 2018-01-11 0:56 sys_stv
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: sys_stv @ 2018-01-11 0:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report; +Cc: arybchenko
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6881 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/32665
_apply patch file failure_
Submitter: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Dec 2017 10:46:39 +0000
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:d23057095e9beff343d1bd2dd76943192c7070ce
Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:34193d50e7ae1cdabbfaa9d26783ac15896438a3
Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:ea6cec076f0a97be33b11d9b6fe1d7abe90319b3
Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:e9e957b8725bffb3d2ffb18467ffab91e3f2fa2e
Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:f06125c07d6203a84e9b242c62d6a8e532a5c51d
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
32665:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 977 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 894 with fuzz 2 (offset -57 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 923 (offset -58 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 966 (offset -58 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1985 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1993 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2009 with fuzz 2 (offset -17 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 620 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 646.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1308 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1348.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1380 (offset 3 lines).
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1045 (offset -13 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
32665:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 977 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 894 with fuzz 2 (offset -57 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 923 (offset -58 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 966 (offset -58 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1985 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1993 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2009 with fuzz 2 (offset -17 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 620 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 646.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1308 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1348.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1380 (offset 3 lines).
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1045 (offset -13 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
Repo: dpdk-next-net
32665:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
3 out of 3 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2002.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 2003 with fuzz 2 (offset -8 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2027.
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
2 out of 2 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
32665:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 977 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 894 with fuzz 2 (offset -57 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 923 (offset -58 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 966 (offset -58 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1985 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1993 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2009 with fuzz 2 (offset -17 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 620 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 646.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1308 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1348.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1380 (offset 3 lines).
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1045 (offset -13 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
32665:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_impl.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 977 with fuzz 2 (offset -3 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 894 with fuzz 2 (offset -57 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 923 (offset -58 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 966 (offset -58 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1985 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1993 (offset -17 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2009 with fuzz 2 (offset -17 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_impl.h
patching file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 134 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 620 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 646.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1308 with fuzz 2.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 1348.
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1380 (offset 3 lines).
2 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/base/efx_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1045 (offset -13 lines).
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.h
DPDK STV team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-01-11 0:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-11 0:56 [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw32665 [PATCH 05/14] net/sfc/base: control RxQ scatter using flag instead of type sys_stv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).