Test-Label: Intel-compilation Test-Status: FAILURE http://dpdk.org/patch/33045 _apply patch file failure_ Submitter: Wenzhuo Lu Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 13:13:29 +0800 DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:18280212534a7dcb61021393afd7394eaa1ff51e Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:8da73c32eb2cc4afc2d56a8db09a6ed30f1064c7 Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:d33a340f42d6b7b664409b572f85707a696fcebc Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:814339ba7eea13d132508af2cccec2f73568e2d0 Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:f477a4696572201cf26534c83a42ec7dc8098fd8 Apply patch file failed: Repo: dpdk-next-net 33045: patching file config/common_base Hunk #1 succeeded at 231 (offset 2 lines). The next patch would create the file doc/guides/nics/features/avf_vec.ini, which already exists! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored patching file drivers/net/avf/Makefile Hunk #1 FAILED at 31. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/Makefile.rej patching file drivers/net/avf/avf.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 119. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf.h.rej patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_ethdev.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 140 with fuzz 2 (offset 19 lines). patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 141 with fuzz 1 (offset 49 lines). Hunk #2 succeeded at 326 with fuzz 2 (offset 73 lines). Hunk #3 FAILED at 361. Hunk #4 succeeded at 601 with fuzz 2 (offset 228 lines). Hunk #5 FAILED at 454. Hunk #6 FAILED at 552. Hunk #7 FAILED at 580. Hunk #8 FAILED at 595. Hunk #9 FAILED at 609. Hunk #10 FAILED at 633. Hunk #11 FAILED at 641. Hunk #12 succeeded at 1724 (offset 366 lines). Hunk #13 FAILED at 1431. Hunk #14 succeeded at 2136 (offset 572 lines). 9 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c.rej patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 6 out of 6 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h.rej The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_common.h, which already exists! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_sse.c, which already exists! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored DPDK STV team