From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: arybchenko@solarflare.com
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw33272 [PATCH v2 1/6] net/sfc: make refill threshold check Rx datapath specific
Date: 15 Jan 2018 13:03:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11803$ai91m@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4062 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/33272
_apply patch file failure_
Submitter: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:24:52 +0000
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:18280212534a7dcb61021393afd7394eaa1ff51e
Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:95415cfefead276dff18262c9d96df73ecb3a8de
Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:fb79a5525fb9d1979654f508c197a4f6186fcaaa
Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:814339ba7eea13d132508af2cccec2f73568e2d0
Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:4f438c85153ef7e910917c38ad60c0b6f296ee2d
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
33272:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 184.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 553 (offset -85 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 808.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Hunk #6 FAILED at 961.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 968 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1005 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1038 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
33272:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 184.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 553 (offset -85 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 808.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Hunk #6 FAILED at 961.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 968 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1005 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1038 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-net
33272:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 104 with fuzz 1 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 184.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 653 (offset 15 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 808.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
9 out of 9 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
33272:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 184.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 553 (offset -85 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 808.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Hunk #6 FAILED at 961.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 968 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1005 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1038 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
33272:
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h
Hunk #2 FAILED at 184.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_dp_rx.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 553 (offset -85 lines).
Hunk #2 FAILED at 808.
1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_ef10_rx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c
Hunk #6 FAILED at 961.
Hunk #7 succeeded at 968 with fuzz 1 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1005 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #9 succeeded at 1038 (offset -5 lines).
1 out of 9 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_rx.c.rej
DPDK STV team
reply other threads:[~2018-01-15 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b11803$ai91m@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).