From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: alanrobertsonatt@gmail.com
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw33823 [PATCH v2] Allow -ve frame_overhead values
Date: 19 Jan 2018 15:49:57 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11803$bvkv2@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9903 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/33823
_Compilation issues_
Submitter: alanrobertsonatt@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:31:57 +0000
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:e8f7a85e71b7391aa389027caa6e6e16169d0f05
Patch33823-33823 --> compile error
Build Summary: 15 Builds Done, 9 Successful, 6 Failures
Test environment and configuration as below:
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Kernel Version:10.3-RELEASE
CPU info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz (2194.97-MHz K8-class CPU)
GCC Version:gcc (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 4.8.5
Clang Version:3.4.1
x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
OS: FC24_64
Kernel Version:4.9.13-100.fc24.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)
Clang Version:3.8.0
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-debug
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
OS: UB1604_64
Kernel Version:4.4.0-78-generic
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
Clang Version:3.8.0
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
OS: CentOS7_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Clang Version:3.4.2
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
Failed Build #1:
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Target: x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function 'opdl_queue_setup':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_q_md; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function 'opdl_dump':
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:16: error: redefinition of 'i'
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:16: note: previous definition of 'i' was here
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:2: error: 'for' loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:110: recipe for target 'opdl_evdev.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:35: recipe for target 'opdl' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:35: recipe for target 'event' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:48: recipe for target 'drivers' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:100: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:79: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #2:
OS: FC24_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-debug
SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_sched.h
SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_sched_common.h
SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_red.h
SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_approx.h
SYMLINK-FILE include/rte_reciprocal.h/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c: In function ‘grinder_credits_check’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c:1595:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘assert’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
assert((int)(pkt->pkt_len + port->frame_overhead) > 0);
^~~~~~
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c:1595:2: error: nested extern declaration of ‘assert’ [-Werror=nested-externs]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:110: recipe for target 'rte_sched.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:35: recipe for target 'librte_sched' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:48: recipe for target 'lib' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:100: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:79: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #3:
OS: FC24_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
LD dpdk-test-crypto-perf
INSTALL-APP dpdk-test-crypto-perf
cp: error writing '/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-test-crypto-perf': No space left on device
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.app.mk:340: recipe for target '/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/app/dpdk-test-crypto-perf' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:35: recipe for target 'test-crypto-perf' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:48: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:100: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:79: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #4:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_queue_setup’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_q_md; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_dump’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:16: error: redefinition of ‘i’
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:16: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
Failed Build #5:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_queue_setup’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_q_md; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_dump’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:16: error: redefinition of ‘i’
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:16: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
Failed Build #6:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_queue_setup’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_q_md; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:291:2: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c: In function ‘opdl_dump’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:16: error: redefinition of ‘i’
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:394:16: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->nb_opdls; i++)
^
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/drivers/event/opdl/opdl_evdev.c:403:2: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode
for (uint32_t i = 0; i < device->max_port_nb; i++) {
^
DPDK STV team
reply other threads:[~2018-01-19 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b11803$bvkv2@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=alanrobertsonatt@gmail.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).