From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw35474 [PATCH v2 3/5] eal: use locks to determine if secondary process is active
Date: 27 Feb 2018 11:07:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b11803$mi8ha@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2250 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/35474
_apply patch file failure_
Submitter: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:23:22 +0000
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:92924b207b124c156f7b6dff75110d6af83d971f
Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:92924b207b124c156f7b6dff75110d6af83d971f
Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:c06ddf9698e0c2a9653cfa971f9ddc205065662c
Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:e8afa4700d57af019993fe3cf5b87e988420b03f
Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:c06ddf9698e0c2a9653cfa971f9ddc205065662c
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
35474:
patching file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 632.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 761 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #12 FAILED at 800.
3 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
35474:
patching file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 632.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 761 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #12 FAILED at 800.
3 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-net
35474:
patching file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 632.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 761 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #12 FAILED at 800.
3 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
35474:
patching file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 632.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 761 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #12 FAILED at 800.
3 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c.rej
Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
35474:
patching file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c
Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 632.
Hunk #11 succeeded at 761 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #12 FAILED at 800.
3 out of 12 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_proc.c.rej
DPDK STV team
reply other threads:[~2018-02-27 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b11803$mi8ha@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).