From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078101B101 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 21:45:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75E6C7916 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ktraynor.remote.csb (ovpn-117-163.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.163]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BC960BEC; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:45:05 +0000 (UTC) To: Sitong Liu , test-report@dpdk.org References: <1255303826.67114763.1546922796418.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> From: Kevin Traynor Organization: Red Hat Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 20:45:04 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1255303826.67114763.1546922796418.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Tue, 08 Jan 2019 20:45:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:57:09 +0100 Subject: Re: [dpdk-test-report] DPDK 18.08 testing - PASS X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 20:45:08 -0000 On 01/08/2019 04:46 AM, Sitong Liu wrote: > Hi all, > > We did a test for DPDK 18.08, no regression bugs were found. > > Testing scenarios: > (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size) PASS > (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) PASS > (3)Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing PASS > (4)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 1Q throughput testing PASS > (5)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 2Q throughput testing PASS > (6)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 2Q & cross numa node throughput testing PASS > (7)vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: ovs reconnect PASS > (8)Guest with vhost-user hot plug throughput testing PASS > (9)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch)vhost-user 1Q live migration testing PASS > (10)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user single queue live migration testing PASS > (11)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing PASS > > > Testing NICs: X540-AT2(ixgbe). > > DPDK: > http://dpdk.org/git/dpdk-stable > commit 35a7f767600712d073e469d873362d03dc1962e4 > Author: Kevin Traynor > Date: Wed Jan 2 18:00:18 2019 +0000 > Revert "raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure" > This reverts commit 8d739a452b4a33d41be4a41d7781e303c425d112. > As per email from Shreyansh: > -- > > Shreyansh Jain (2): > > bus/fslmc: fix physical addressing check > > raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure <==== this > Please don't apply the 'raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure' > patch. There is problem with this as reported in another patch [1]. I > will push a fix out (which would actually be reverting this patch) > [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48635/ > -- > Fixes: 8d739a452b4a ("raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure") > Cc: Shreyansh Jain > Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor > > If you have any concern about the result, please let me know, thanks. > Thank you Sitong, regards, Kevin. > Best regards, > Sitong Liu > Red Hat. >