From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: shperetz@nvidia.com
Subject: |SUCCESS|dpdk|e37ff4ef29| intel-Functional
Date: 19 Sep 2025 11:10:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d449ee$58gq82@fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4458 bytes --]
Test-Label: intel-Functional
Test-Status: SUCCESS
_Functional PASS_
DPDK git repo: dpdk
commit e37ff4ef296f33e4c3a0e9306241c4f8fcae5061
Author: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu Sep 18 09:47:54 2025 +0300
eal: fix DMA mask validation with IOVA mode option
When --iova-mode is explicitly specified in command line, DMA mask
constraints were not being validated, leading to potential runtime
failures when device DMA capabilities are exceeded.
The issue occurred because rte_bus_get_iommu_class() was only called
during IOVA mode auto-detection, but this function has the important
side effect of triggering DMA mask detection (e.g., Intel IOMMU
address width checking via pci_device_iommu_support_va()).
This created an inconsistency, when choosing explicit mode,
the DMA checks are bypassed, but when choosing auto-detection mode,
the constraints are checked and enforced.
The fix moves rte_bus_get_iommu_class() outside the conditional logic
to ensure it's always called during EAL initialization.
Fixes: 4374ebc24bc1 ("malloc: modify error message for DMA mask check")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Shani Peretz <shperetz@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Smoke-Testing Summary : 31 Case Done, 31 Successful, 0 Failures
OS : Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS
Kernel : 5.15.0-60-generic
GCC : 11.3.0-1ubuntu1~22.04
NIC : Ethernet Controller XL710 for 40GbE QSFP+
Target : x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
Test result details:
+-----------------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+
| suite | case | status|
+-----------------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+
| checksum_offload| test_checksum_offload_with_vlan | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_do_not_insert_checksum_on_the_transmit_packet| passed|
| checksum_offload| test_hardware_checksum_check_ip_rx | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_hardware_checksum_check_ip_tx | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_hardware_checksum_check_l4_rx | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_insert_checksum_on_the_transmit_packet | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_rx_checksum_valid_flags | passed|
| checksum_offload| test_hardware_checksum_check_l4_tx | n/a |
| dual_vlan | test_dual_vlan_priority_rxtx | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_filter_config | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_filter_table | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_insert_config | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_random_test | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_strip_config | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_synthetic_test | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_tpid_config | passed|
| dual_vlan | test_vlan_stripq_config | n/a |
| jumboframes | test_jumboframes_bigger_jumbo | passed|
| jumboframes | test_jumboframes_jumbo_jumbo | passed|
| jumboframes | test_jumboframes_jumbo_nojumbo | passed|
| jumboframes | test_jumboframes_normal_jumbo | passed|
| jumboframes | test_jumboframes_normal_nojumbo | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_rxoffload_port_all | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_rxoffload_port_cmdline | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_port | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_port_all | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_port_checksum | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_port_cmdline | passed|
| rxtx_offload | test_rxoffload_queue | n/a |
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_port_multi_segs | n/a |
| rxtx_offload | test_txoffload_queue | n/a |
+-----------------+---------------------------------------------------+-------+
DPDK STV team
next reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 18:10 sys_stv [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-09-19 19:10 sys_stv
2025-09-19 11:37 sys_stv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='d449ee$58gq82@fmviesa010-auth.fm.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=shperetz@nvidia.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).