From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: wenzhuo.lu@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw33471 [PATCH v7 12/14] net/avf: enable sse vector Rx Tx func
Date: 16 Jan 2018 22:03:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7a79a$pqqkr@orsmga002.jf.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4554 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/33471
_apply patch file failure_
Submitter: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 21:02:05 +0800
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, Branch:master, CommitID:49194debd126076ab0805f608340017af2df8655
Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, Branch:master, CommitID:2644d66b2bcc62abb58cdce8121f204962d083b8
Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:0f708db31ed0a8616165f90c4abbb9c0382df5eb
Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, Branch:master, CommitID:9158926a0f24e9b8cccfe97211fa72d52a6f6a36
Repo:dpdk, Branch:master, CommitID:1334a505ef4de2471d1cd3cf561304ce7757d320
Apply patch file failed:
Repo: dpdk
33471:
patching file config/common_base
Hunk #1 succeeded at 232 (offset 3 lines).
The next patch would create the file doc/guides/nics/features/avf_vec.ini,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file drivers/net/avf/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/Makefile.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 119.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 140 with fuzz 2 (offset 19 lines).
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 141 with fuzz 1 (offset 49 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 326 with fuzz 2 (offset 73 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 361.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 601 with fuzz 2 (offset 228 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 454.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 552.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 580.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 595.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 609.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 633.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 641.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1724 (offset 366 lines).
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1431.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 2136 (offset 572 lines).
9 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h.rej
The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_common.h,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_sse.c,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
Repo: dpdk-next-net
33471:
patching file config/common_base
Hunk #1 succeeded at 231 (offset 2 lines).
The next patch would create the file doc/guides/nics/features/avf_vec.ini,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
patching file drivers/net/avf/Makefile
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/Makefile.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 119.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf.h.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_ethdev.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 140 with fuzz 2 (offset 19 lines).
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 141 with fuzz 1 (offset 49 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 326 with fuzz 2 (offset 73 lines).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 361.
Hunk #4 succeeded at 601 with fuzz 2 (offset 228 lines).
Hunk #5 FAILED at 454.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 552.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 580.
Hunk #8 FAILED at 595.
Hunk #9 FAILED at 609.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 633.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 641.
Hunk #12 succeeded at 1724 (offset 366 lines).
Hunk #13 FAILED at 1431.
Hunk #14 succeeded at 2136 (offset 572 lines).
9 out of 14 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.c.rej
patching file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
6 out of 6 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx.h.rej
The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_common.h,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
The next patch would create the file drivers/net/avf/avf_rxtx_vec_sse.c,
which already exists! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
DPDK STV team
reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 6:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f7a79a$pqqkr@orsmga002.jf.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).