From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <andrea.bigagli@commprove.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com
 [209.85.218.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D85D960B
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:43:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id p204so5472625oih.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=commprove.com; s=google;
 h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=JEy79w5mAV1yHfZiKoboCtgNqnIkYP6awpgjznBT0Rg=;
 b=DlaZzFV+rQsIz7WMQMOmHQaJbv4u7gKISU1qUn2QMjdeb/tjYc1ZiGMci6VlgP06Ku
 HOlN7MyEHicVKXEjU4KOtEVpnmbsYjKz7nls74zTBCIFlNRKunRdUDu5GvdB1nwypfmt
 zRSFlU7tLa4XDqYobV8iDm0eNNMspSrSiXe/8=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=JEy79w5mAV1yHfZiKoboCtgNqnIkYP6awpgjznBT0Rg=;
 b=L0pRzNK0I0em7XcsYt/tV6PLS6sQyB/2YPM1vxvHMuZBfu8w6WzVQqAmI2v+x3hXuM
 wz5R0zdJ21EXoTmjm0XgKIHIFQDHzY6mGOxYwqQq+feGYLOozlKGBDfQKi9vlz5ATy1H
 OUi7U0QVlow4Wu5iFL3bEclmcuAe/CpvnSU9Q+vxQ7GXvqq1FYnce29RUq6URkdPA8gO
 ZGhM0PaJ+NEKMqSoKQZ0K05Hy9jq07g5ibvU7ustT6hWgJ4rlEZcwcnpQJY3xnHrOQ4N
 COoBlIhuUTpE683+2ZnQk86NghB7NUlOFr+go0ltfULhp7dMFEVOeJIWJ3xZB0akdoda
 QfXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI4cWLBooMq9dEyXhf3kliESTyZQSd1AoL+PRYY5bzC0D1C59aqi8QDp5Lm0sh3cMIfrkuEuvljrJUjvg==
X-Received: by 10.157.12.72 with SMTP id 66mr12339740otr.192.1465940584861;
 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Andrea Bigagli <andrea.bigagli@commprove.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <3878315A-53FD-4721-B527-328FB5C2EFC6@commprove.com>
 <CAN7yQ2rQPQ438YSY4MTGVd7iiDoV0YQ7WUFmAAV6CcD4PxM19g@mail.gmail.com>
 <64D55C7D-F8E0-47A3-B032-DB9DFCFC307B@commprove.com>
 <CAN7yQ2rZNN9mX=xikF3Z0Hvi7iw1_VWXtighqogVfK1CeZot4g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN7yQ2rZNN9mX=xikF3Z0Hvi7iw1_VWXtighqogVfK1CeZot4g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:43:03 +0200
Message-ID: <-5504103702625557025@unknownmsgid>
To: Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen <zain2294@gmail.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Is it possible to TX through a port with no RX
	connected?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 21:43:05 -0000

Nope.
I've got 4 dual port boards, and have to handle 8 RX. But I'm curious as
what the workaround would be?


On 14 giu 2016, at 23:39, Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen <zain2294@gmail.com>
wrote:

How many interface u got, if u got spare, u can work around