From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF00A0C4E for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:35:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E7D411B6; Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:35:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A8A4120E for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 18:11:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A055C02A3; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:11:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap21 ([10.202.2.71]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:11:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=nE9slGDhqeXyfZLsdCeG4qEVD2yhEkv fTH2DC15C+D8=; b=rQkLqxAQ3jZWHTTDhBa1CVESdZ/Pn1i3JLsVk44nAfla3oC d6GyOR+YWfL4fX8HZM99AqPIL+/yo9LpgYhx7OTGF1Rx6I3l191YmefYkHd4s3Yi gfuAUvhkCZb/IdUVUKKKMirMVeix9MEAm1n4S73pJjV/XdpzuTnKnVDnHM27QAC/ VZvty3B0NkQlLaY4PLXClVDox7rUEmztCNmUjP6pQllhaMOlpb4EIzlN3EB3BfsV IeBvl9/yWnOsINQLfT09z2UeKZA5kd91thAb+HAC8P2qKicPYRP9vyV7N524rZB2 hsT94n0mpmZGU3dn0TnfeDcIFLczYgQV52iMPHA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=nE9slG DhqeXyfZLsdCeG4qEVD2yhEkvfTH2DC15C+D8=; b=lGv/HIyZnBATqydnF3yMUs URc2UMQ4wp3VxbcBuUEc0Ziwgb5PYEMHCXA1clJyjhaTfvrGF6De0/f9UXsqd/3s mlYdB6O9gnHqsK6auDNDvbpmlqRGbiNzo5rgdhKGrFWgM21+mZyN/Ia8nbn41VgJ 1T4+GZ15gpqdeJutT7vhd/bCgSFkYmRf8je/G1scfLoko+cStsqJMTyoft9M2wXT GEU9nvNX6gMv3Ily3lHb4xwN70waYzNuzF3WG54yZSFlM0IKhxI33SwteDTfcza6 py1sFJQ2C/to90AgO3M3EB+lS1EDlOq1dxwxq6u4wfhuJ+iG4tBsgIQf4BQG+CGA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrtddtgdehiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfvfihlhgv rhcuuehlrghirhdfuceothgslhgrihhrsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnheptdetudetleejteejjedtfeetkeehvedukeeuhfejgfekgedvhedvkeff feevhedunecuffhomhgrihhnpedtgidutddttddtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgslhgrihhrsehfrghsthhmrghi lhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 22CB151C0060; Tue, 6 Jul 2021 12:11:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-531-g1160beca77-fm-20210705.001-g1160beca Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0c3b2d55-6e9e-43bd-bf33-b734f8b17d44@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20210706075717.1013bf3c@hermes.local> References: <91abe2f9-82e0-45f0-9d7c-d9d5bf70d4f2@www.fastmail.com> <20210629104335.0fb73114@hermes.local> <20210705092401.6a007088@hermes.local> <4333b53a-11b7-4d82-9c2c-543f33f30067@www.fastmail.com> <20210706075717.1013bf3c@hermes.local> Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 12:10:50 -0400 From: "Tyler Blair" To: "Stephen Hemminger" Cc: users@dpdk.org, "Long Li" Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 18:35:27 +0200 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] qdisc errors on 20.11.1 & Azure X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" > The next thing to check is version of rdma-core. Long just diagnosed an issue with rdma-core version in Ubuntu 20.4 That's the version I'm using in my last reply -- from ppa:canonical-server/server-backports: 33.1-1ubuntu1~backport20.04-202103240925~ubuntu20.04.1 Noticed now, but with the new kernal and rdma-core librdmacm-dev from backports there are some new mlx5_pci errors. Appears to be working OK otherwise though. EAL: Detected 8 lcore(s) EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA' EAL: Probing VFIO support... EAL: VFIO support initialized EAL: Probe PCI driver: mlx5_pci (15b3:1016) device: 5ed7:00:02.0 (socket 0) ** mlx5_pci: Failed to allocate Tx DevX UAR (BF) ** mlx5_pci: Failed to allocate Rx DevX UAR (BF) ** mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. ** mlx5_pci: Size 0xFFFF is not power of 2, will be aligned to 0x10000. net_vdev_netvsc: probably using routed NetVSC interface "eth1" (index 3) tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Cannot delete qdisc with handle of zero tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid tap_nl_dump_ext_ack(): Failed to find qdisc with specified classid Warning: NUMA should be configured manually by using --port-numa-config and --ring-numa-config parameters along with --numa. testpmd: create a new mbuf pool : n=155456, size=2176, socket=0 testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc Warning! port-topology=paired and odd forward ports number, the last port will pair with itself. Configuring Port 1 (socket 0) Port 1: 00:22:48:3B:AB:CC Checking link statuses... Marked with ** - these appear to be pretty benign as well though. Regards, Tyler