DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 金塔尖之鑫 <win239@126.com>
To: users@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-users] HOW performance to run DPDK at ARM64 arch?
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:24:22 +0800 (CST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397ab53.8240.167eefaa3c7.Coremail.win239@126.com> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=GBK, Size: 1563 bytes --]

recently, I have debug DPDK18.08 at my arm64 arch machine, with DPDK-pktgen3.5.2.
but the performace is very low for bidirectional traffic with x86 machine

here is my data:
hardware Conditions£º
        arm64:    CPU - 64 cores, CPUfreq: 1.5GHz
                       MEM - 64 GiB
                       NIC - 82599ES dual port
        x86:        CPU - 4 cores, CPUfreq: 3.2GHz
                       MEM - 4GiB
                       NIC - 82599ES dual port
software Conditions:
         system kernel:
                  arm64: linux-4.4.58
                  x86: ubuntu16.04-4.4.0-generic
         tools:
                  DPDK18.08, DPDK-pktgen3.5.2

test:
       |----------|                bi-directional                |-----------|
       | arm64 | port0 |           < - >            | port0 |     x86   |
       |----------|                                                     |----------|

result
                                  arm64                                   x86
Pkts/s (Rx/Tx)            10.2/6.0Mpps                       6.0/14.80Mpps
MBits/s(Rx/Tx)             7000/3300 MBits/s             3300/9989 MBits/s

Questions£º
1¡¢Why DPDK data performance would be so much worse than the x86 architecture in arm64 addition?
2¡¢above, Tx direction is not run full, Why Rx and TX affect each other£¿
\x16º&­©³j\x1aÞ†f§‚f¢•Ê&N^[ƒyÍ»×M»ç´×Ä^¶êç=«a­©³j\x1aÞ†f§‚f¢•Ê&Eç\x1eŠ÷~º&™¨¥¾M_×Í ¢ˆ%yÊ&™¨¥¾M_×Í ¢ˆ%yÊ&ÛO|çmµ×Í›ÉÚ]’Šà>‹-~,pŠØDHÄωß8è0yëÍ_¢»¬z»\x1d¥Ù(®\x04á»nÃyÍ´×ÍtÛ¾yûMtÐ!\x13Eç\x1eŠ÷o)šŠ[äÕý|Ú
(‚Wœ¢l"¶\x14ŒLøŸ]º²üç­´îù\x1e×gè®ë\x1e®ÇivJ+8nÛ°Þsm5óMvïžtóM\x0fI0Ê Ä¢‚v­º·¯

             reply	other threads:[~2018-12-27  9:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-27  9:24 金塔尖之鑫 [this message]
2018-12-27 16:41 ` Pierre Laurent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1397ab53.8240.167eefaa3c7.Coremail.win239@126.com \
    --to=win239@126.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).