From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>,
"O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:27:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547412.qzivax5BEW@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018113401.GA5434@localhost.localdomain>
2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception that we need to address.
> >
> > I would say that there is still a perception issue, for companies who
> > look at the active developers, the owners of the project's resources
> > (infra, domain name), and who have heard anecdotal evidence of issues in
> > the past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have
> > been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with
> > the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned
> > parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a
> > move to the LF.
>
> +1
How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than
"hear concerns" or "heard anecdotal evidence of issues"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 8:33 [dpdk-users] " O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-17 10:23 ` Hobywan Kenoby
2016-10-17 11:52 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-17 12:40 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 14:40 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-18 13:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 21:23 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] " Dave Neary
2016-10-18 11:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-18 13:27 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-10-18 16:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-19 8:04 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-19 8:40 ` Dave Neary
2016-10-19 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-19 9:09 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-18 4:16 ` Liu Yuan
2016-10-18 10:29 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] How to printout PMD logs to console yingzhi
2016-10-18 10:58 ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-10-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Project Governance and Linux Foundation Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-21 14:00 ` Dave Neary
2016-10-21 17:20 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-22 19:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-12 5:44 qin.chunhua
2016-10-12 7:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-13 6:10 ` Muhammad Zain-ul-Abideen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547412.qzivax5BEW@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dneary@redhat.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).