From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E2F567A for ; Mon, 5 Sep 2016 09:57:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id 1so123860041wmz.1 for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:57:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPJvKUiRiRdP2lt0G79uJdq4UWqlLMPEySxui3nDrbg=; b=W0epSajt+TnpTPt+JMdBtdwQkSQbX2p5HQD3RTndotEbf+2rXr+O0fUbxwmhyWuLW7 vg/honZKQA7FLpdt663gzwYfoApfb6iJQ1IYDjtbeGIGd0gXqTPra5y4gLrUt2FCSIjN 3EPpifbIe9N5yWi8IjMFPWdlOxzwpQNWHAdIKeGNChRqnEqYAe/9NUpoBH68oXXzjMhd vj02fi4Iu/jhjgDzZzxja0y8Lzowbxi9PRDM1ms07ykHHQvo3QJjEyxinzst0Ch8KSO5 74oYkj6/GRsj7IskY1X8ZNbzkeCtJDjV1VqynQJyf1Wx72NPDsLIJ9seCL2tlTxc09II 9XkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iPJvKUiRiRdP2lt0G79uJdq4UWqlLMPEySxui3nDrbg=; b=EmmQNEZZryPc7la/UW6/cfBSFzDrALYd5MFZz5bQHPau14Vx3AvFxVIcbLaosMXPbu 4qr8uIHJclWReh0C/Jmt/8/EnzcOsJd1/wao08gClOqXdcwRPGPHy2HBuLrDVND+rpkf zn8EHrtRnQx+/LKje5Ll4DV0D2kAk5r2k6NECaGZAUHCpqNvs/1l++fCPCMivSOI4VmX 6YL2LjvtHYr1fVaFQlG1Zih18ajqHweNkjfHELgPrU9Y/KOgX3VMcOZCYdYPPc7W6YXM o2w12guNQXKf3dH0ltZXD5zBRbo8BJ9ftGpMWAXtiMjicxU6hWYLSs2DVwmPlmjaAjh0 fUCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMyge337rO3x93kl9mFv3GPY3QtWTjiFP2TTpUniV2JHcOaaX0h9gr1XtDKnPKDyvoH X-Received: by 10.28.29.215 with SMTP id d206mr13352020wmd.75.1473062277358; Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:57:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o2sm26170301wjo.3.2016.09.05.00.57.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:57:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Gao Ya'nan Cc: users@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 09:57:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1847119.8aDmHCeqkf@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Does DPDK support big endian system? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 07:57:57 -0000 2016-09-05 11:49, Gao Ya'nan: > Hi all, > > I am trying porting librte_acl to a platform with Cavium MIPS64 processor. > I tried the a set of rules and a trace file on x86 Linux first and then run > testacl on this platform with same rules and trace file, but didn't see any > right result. > > Any suggestion would be appreciate. Some DPDK areas try to manage endianness right but it's not tested and I would not be surprised that ACL would need some fixes for big endian. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ECE9364 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:04:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2016 01:04:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,298,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="1036945428" Received: from orsmsx110.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.8]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2016 01:04:09 -0700 Received: from rrsmsp801.amr.corp.intel.com (10.9.230.203) by ORSMSX110.amr.corp.intel.com (10.22.240.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 8 Sep 2016 01:04:08 -0700 Received: from Pickup by RRSMSP801.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.301.0; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:17:09 +0000 From: Thomas Monjalon Sender: users To: Gao Ya'nan CC: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 01:57:54 -0600 Message-ID: <1847119.8aDmHCeqkf@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGG2XqQYIxOahnZYUYhShZeLMjwZgK2OXXp Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Does DPDK support big endian system? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 08:04:10 -0000 Message-ID: <20160905075754.wvkN_AfdcECQq32M2pTNNlqFdHgZeBsT2AF_VZK6afk@z> 2016-09-05 11:49, Gao Ya'nan: > Hi all, > > I am trying porting librte_acl to a platform with Cavium MIPS64 processor. > I tried the a set of rules and a trace file on x86 Linux first and then run > testacl on this platform with same rules and trace file, but didn't see any > right result. > > Any suggestion would be appreciate. Some DPDK areas try to manage endianness right but it's not tested and I would not be surprised that ACL would need some fixes for big endian.