From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nm16-vm6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm16-vm6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.177.254]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2891094 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:07:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s2048; t=1484042830; bh=c19z3afOXi8q5WzmA7doV7ID5jDbKS3j6u+EM6b6FcU=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=LgRa6vcFHElwlXO+2O5Ve/4+VX8YBi+T+zSDNe9ENHIg3IaPbZ/VWZOiM0vvIyhcvQiKeMn4DqRsLveg6JAQNmJuSrrvYUMeA8fd84eWsPG77mEYGdkd2jF2aDmaL/LXsSMl5pPNZKz7ARXsAxurnYUgol0DzYq0q6I53z9pUXVyQwJTvrBWIUdnD1tQ8/nEv+q43b7BapYvH0h9p6Ji2qd0I3ZVUPHoAEXKbiTQ2hD4TxMhLGj4HnFGli6jiPfvj6X6x/dpOAIZek9YqJi6/sus61+RktfFkzeKznLq4YM0CLolcDM7yDreBnLykmlZKJgr+geh2r5KDbYYhcNXWQ== Received: from [98.137.12.55] by nm16.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2017 10:07:10 -0000 Received: from [98.137.12.192] by tm15.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2017 10:07:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1000.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 10 Jan 2017 10:07:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 695955.96324.bm@omp1000.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: vBwaAU4VM1n0QCYc0RyiyFogWByxTxhk__E66ynfYkXdWOeo5yGSMfIslJ50Flq Wh8r16M6CH5Mnr2ycUoRpWJfuAFhncaI9IpIQwSyaqa.JM6rEjluVXKXPmZV2FKd4XkGawWTAEPK jgAYIgso8mmoG_xFB1MMUU69XP40txW8n9CK5_wWRRfNu4LIjAeZ2I66HPhYGNx8_2ucdKSzFRfk E0c_mVXmb.tR6kzb18pacNFrTyZUxdSJt0LhvByOW4lVL0AZjreVzvaO24wSfIiQbMUGSGeXUp6. .H4l14WrRhdolErlC0LreCNaFx6DuLX3UK7o0KkCZ5DPSxlppa7_BIX_rSJ602ExQqISXG7X048R MPM5wVzwsZH9kT79mt1GMvdab52WgM5cWIlTYImIPKunpuFG0dtNcKce4t_DkMHoRDcO3Av5XLon qhQjJI079RsH4WFDlbVVErqcZUwxC2XE322oPhV_w_m0cmunZF152fhNdBuRvjawe6ZSwSdglpKJ fmCYi8ivG5p5QYTEz8g1n3YEXMAg- Received: from jws300042.mail.gq1.yahoo.com by sendmailws123.mail.gq1.yahoo.com; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:07:10 +0000; 1484042830.336 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 09:16:21 +0000 (UTC) From: rajesh kumar To: "users@dpdk.org" Message-ID: <1872226418.305244.1484039781760@mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1872226418.305244.1484039781760.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-users] Intel Core i7 Box supporst AESNI-MB and AESNI_GCM drivers? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: rajesh kumar List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:07:12 -0000 Hi All, We are using ubuntu 16.x version in Intel core i7 box. We want to develop application to handle DPDK crypto API operation. I want to test the AESNI Instruction set on the core i7 box and we are trying to use AESNI_MB and AESNI_GCM PMDs. Can someone let me know whether i can use AESNI_MB and AESNI_GCM PMDs to test the AESNI instruction set. Thanks,Rajesh >From anand.sa88@gmail.com Tue Jan 10 11:24:00 2017 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vk0-f51.google.com (mail-vk0-f51.google.com [209.85.213.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB5220F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:24:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-vk0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t8so23963478vke.3 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:24:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CrgmQLJwjgVXaKDccM0OW2KHCEAls4zOuKup/y+ERes=; b=CDg9Ygfsqf2BqpIZAwnLyzz+jxnlRrfoK0vP+goFM6pF/ZQlVEz8Kord5TeVlgKanr t9QCb1cOuvlA9Zo4QTZfdxOhvsEIDgmxYa3xZQWebnPomekAxVO2BJ6/TeAWB04fsusU eUYQixcNJ7vK9UMsoRv1Rtnv4d3DInxfZRk0+JoHwbmgzKLq05k1WGQ+5WfBX59m+9wM bRvMIa9+feSf0HOGlVR8RonumlZHKfkIViBrPMEjnTbxvX0llJsZ/KkBf8Rca0koI2YM NsPyN3NXg+PsgRlAUSggl901bFBmXl7DbwmVRdZXC5Up84TDt7AEcz3dm1SF/VsmBPzT roZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CrgmQLJwjgVXaKDccM0OW2KHCEAls4zOuKup/y+ERes=; b=d0fS3aXqRVwBujF43LxeDhx/x3XYzFMC6TF3lKYurGlCjFyWmpVErjOcOoWbnxO0zN dV5FudJLcRu+z0ttKNFcUT7fUGxSQUryBVd+MB0FhB1NZREREbh6yyamURTx9BBE5L3t nQE+xsbqdMuJYHVUntvu8jWV8xObuzh1TGX6apip8AiPiUp06n4wbK3qW5EKgVTnVwbQ slnxOoqhVQ4VdEA8c0ZXzOAKKRN7yVloBkrmmTaI5cEPTW+5pn4TV2vh9OKCuqANm8uS oP4eM+plyiuXwFi7abmPffWqjMkqXcAzJt7/bjFCSC7ESEHY9EZuo22SAfiYuT4HL8s4 Tmnw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLqwyiRKNCZ8Qm8S2hUfSLgiLiIj3SiZOmStde1mRsB4EJFbccETVpLWV6VIeg1chbK3C7eSk3bOp1Chg== X-Received: by 10.31.230.134 with SMTP id d128mr1078595vkh.118.1484043839514; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:23:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.16.68 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 02:23:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: SAKTHIVEL ANAND S Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:53:59 +0530 Message-ID: To: raman geetha gopalakrishnan , users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Reg DPDK support for Cavium Octeon III X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:24:00 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 3:31 PM, SAKTHIVEL ANAND S wrote: > Hi > From dpdk.org , "The first supported CPU was Intel x86 and it is now > extended to IBM Power 8, EZchip TILE-Gx and ARM" and i know cavium have > their own data path handler(6wind will support both dpdk and octeon). > i dont find any info/patch for cavium processors support form DPDK side, > as of now. But anyhow, let the community confirm that. > > Thanks > Sakthivel S OM > > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 1:03 PM, raman geetha gopalakrishnan < > glowingsun@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Would like to know if DPDK supports >> >> 1. Cavium Octeon III >> 2. Anything extra involved apart from the usual installation process. >> 3. Where i can find info on supported processors for DPDK??? ( @ a single >> place : ) ) >> >> Thanks >> Raman >> > > > > -- > Thanks > Sakthivel S OM > > -- Thanks Sakthivel S OM