From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2A35684 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:21:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a66so124990574wme.0 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:21:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jwq1BT7/A9fz13ElZXGriZgUxoqXo2f9Ot0VtbSvWk8=; b=aDxUESsLh55TZ1iIVLaiRCen3xzNBLBp9WmiUu9M5HgBo2AT7lHuNDbBq2u1O9uxOY JUfRdkc4XLWfkKBy7gqsijQXsKJRai+D72f9hlAX+jxu3SjpxyQ7ot94zIeUjP3eqYqM VBOZ8TKa4RZAba4wy6ZoZ2ljD/OA/ohYTqHaX/bVQtwAIG+n/7SextSU1H44F4EPddFr MxVplnLTSvb/gD57xnBSSQwV5k8l8RsvNcbbENbaI8qDeNmLZP+sjV0c3wxjj76v+f0K uMNkEj8GmDff+EJPwGkslwMqZkgQfT84UlkJv+48dLGuyctsooxpn/lWuXuGOG/nBCz5 j+xg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jwq1BT7/A9fz13ElZXGriZgUxoqXo2f9Ot0VtbSvWk8=; b=WKD+kkHTHX9XlZ6Dzovk+UkIujBMJgBOw/8s9WdN8nFb700BWmbQKqxtVIv5cExtSd NtwPIpJNqPTnrGNjbyKZEQ+gZoE0IpcsyeTqAabA4oMilhJx6dFNTj4g08e4UYimBaiG giT4dBVb8w539rpZ3CW++QzeK3aaA9U8YZ68Vo4+mbEpxo5/qB2uoCbl32uXnMB0PIQb WwQo2zLlwJKJTdVyC5Zs1+R6kS3LNeGcJHlXsVRRSuA+Zw902mPkfeWFvvOYkLXVK6a/ Odt4h7PNZNdOJ2oRVHnv/wcJlvM/L9Msgane5yLssq0t1hgKT8b31YWVlx11Z5y8uvjp EgDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKSRIOrIyAlI4BbqHb/V4tOLIpqybTwd0CUiGZcgnZfgZdiiamFvtEpDH7vHSXeDNkT X-Received: by 10.194.158.138 with SMTP id wu10mr1814470wjb.84.1467048074206; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bb4sm40512wjb.32.2016.06.27.10.21.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: users@dpdk.org, John Sucaet Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:21:12 +0200 Message-ID: <1915917.1pjbjoP1tt@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160627092334.6131ac4d@xeon-e3> References: <5770F822.7070303@oneaccess-net.com> <20160627092334.6131ac4d@xeon-e3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Detect LSC capability of dpdk ports X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:21:14 -0000 2016-06-27 09:23, Stephen Hemminger: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:55:46 +0200 > John Sucaet wrote: > > How can a dpdk application determine if a port has support for lsc, > > before trying to configure it? > > We ended up adding this patch, which never seemed to be accepted upstream. No, this patch was part of a series for Hyper-V. Why Hyper-V PMD is still not integrated? What is the status please? > From 79060ea428f070f309f577006af43eb4ab74586d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 17:14:32 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH 1/7] ether: add function to query for link state interrupt > > Allow application to query whether link state will work. > This is also part of abstracting dependency on PCI. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger