From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com (sender163-mail.zoho.com [74.201.84.163]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AF4C8D95 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 00:51:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (177.92.63.194 [177.92.63.194]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1448927483409731.6480147049375; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:51:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:51:11 -0200 From: Flavio Leitner To: "Traynor, Kevin" Message-ID: <20151130235111.GC8825@x240.home> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 14:57:59 +0100 Cc: "dev@openvswitch.org" , "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [ovs-dev] OVS with DPDK Meetup notes X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 23:51:25 -0000 On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 05:56:08PM +0000, Traynor, Kevin wrote: > Hi All, > > Just wanted to post some summary notes on the recent OVS with DPDK Meetup we > had after the OVS conference. Thanks to everyone for the often lively discussion. > I've collated and condensed Maryam's notes (Thank you Maryam) with my own. > Corrections and additions are welcome. Thanks for having organized the event and for the good notes. > Usability > ========== > * Single binary for OVS/OVS with DPDK and static vs. dynamic linking > - Discussion around deployment and what the best model is. > - Flavio has posted a mail on this > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-November/062599.html Let us know if you find a performance difference between static vs dynamic linking. We might be able to accommodate both options in the same spec, but it seems we should go with shared linking only to keep it simple for now. > Features > ======== > * Multiqueue vhost-user > - Looks really promising - will help us scale out performance to the VM. I see that vhost PMD is moving and if it gets accepted, it would be a nice clean up for OVS. Do you know if there is someone working on this already? > * dpdkr/ivshmem > - Still useful. Check/Update documentation to ensure limitations are clear. Yeah, same thing here. Thanks, fbl