From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com (mail-pf0-f173.google.com [209.85.192.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0052567F for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:35:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id h14so63910616pfe.1 for ; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hBOSgX2MBd1yhsqqgjdcO6azG+WAu/6MtbEiyUvgkCM=; b=1gudQWvM77UHxBeLP3SH9mHw51S5ZM4QdfLrxeVMUmZRubskODP25kAzjCvp45tX+x xF4XR8epbRig0aZW8YnZYq7RnJgxJAFq5WbTLs99Bj4Lgv1GHYwj1gu94BDdPkSVV+wA Tk8VVkY0tL9unUS/RZ6hYiDh5QguIJzFoZRGC/E1F3cZzZxu2NMK//elvDDr4IQurgui hTZ3k6vM8sYmQMiyxT4Jsx+xxtXJz/3RNX5tST52VJZZMMTx48GoR61sVgpLmQhHCTxO +Sybj1G3lbDhueVtp8UL6QxqmNhuZ6pFyUX3w/Yyed4UyIb60iPg14SCKDAPrAQ2AxgQ 0jSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hBOSgX2MBd1yhsqqgjdcO6azG+WAu/6MtbEiyUvgkCM=; b=fGTb8bjAMExWIRaqox14Syi803+ImWgTetWPgpsACQqiYCY8O5oycumrb7WVnmNHea 1QwnBFGPiB6jlb7WL5T/1NWVWarW7Ns5BRTD/mOOKX90Ax7BXf7Ps48FErnmUvw4+7Ur wFPhgLSDCPFU2ZX95nGxH4Qo2zDS4qEUhNBV/0BrEureTTnjKzxgKIwwLtQZNixF0UR2 q7RpCWLPxwKikV+HKDtl3U5f9jIzyToNlE06T9xddyl/hFm+62MKK8u2gY6/kZgEgU9f 9jRmb8nqrSSDPvMWw3cBIl/QVe5WNZAVjVwMPouets+Sl+e+cz3idAbFR/lRm2EO0AYU CWhw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLzlM9fhSD0c1pbQUJBXIin/ecE6j3p30hCynaVQ224lwRQ0qPlj4OXSO0GSAXeMg== X-Received: by 10.98.19.77 with SMTP id b74mr35451993pfj.145.1467048907004; Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:35:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-69-251.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.69.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h66sm1248445pfe.6.2016.06.27.10.35.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 10:35:21 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: users@dpdk.org, John Sucaet Message-ID: <20160627103521.02c7a362@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1915917.1pjbjoP1tt@xps13> References: <5770F822.7070303@oneaccess-net.com> <20160627092334.6131ac4d@xeon-e3> <1915917.1pjbjoP1tt@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Detect LSC capability of dpdk ports X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 17:35:07 -0000 On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 19:21:12 +0200 Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-06-27 09:23, Stephen Hemminger: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 11:55:46 +0200 > > John Sucaet wrote: > > > How can a dpdk application determine if a port has support for lsc, > > > before trying to configure it? > > > > We ended up adding this patch, which never seemed to be accepted upstream. > > No, this patch was part of a series for Hyper-V. > Why Hyper-V PMD is still not integrated? What is the status please? The original driver was on older code base. There is some activity to port a newer FreeBSD driver code base but it was not ready last I checked. Ask Jan Blunck the DPDK maintainer now at Brocade.