From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f170.google.com (mail-pf0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD3E2BBE for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 17:07:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q86so14354980pfl.3 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:07:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cusiaj8X3mj83Qz6PxtJY1Fi33A7afoGQNQdAAjEkTo=; b=OzdT5IE5Y2ldJPH5fafVWNsz4vaIbALy6NeQl9ZHoCG0AgSDEXTRJkNSSiSOnNqesg da7ZfVcnllxXnIkvhSd6KU9ORrj9siByUxYEhuBYtLPXGZWdbcV9Cpvk2JVR/cpsHl3E Sey6OXAM15miO1EYdscOCaYYb4c+IfZeIKTvzWZprf2gqpSsKlKqUA/J+3JH3E4iGdd2 BkqgVBNv4/wTKrd6XxnTYLp7K0q6VSnK5ohEM7FuQ5SPa1M/P7L9YKXevBiuRgJlMQk6 P4oKftA4JrIrUeT4Ev61LJwBXrOrCwygC6wdc0/6akiTM3ToFurMZGjOqEC6r+Qxy3Ep Pjvw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cusiaj8X3mj83Qz6PxtJY1Fi33A7afoGQNQdAAjEkTo=; b=HvjXDjLfw9nCkXQYynVrSeCHKu6lVpQdwh9Vyw9MKlacVbELOzhBf2MGhfuPHYZstN A/P/FXDHasmn0R7VCHuIS1II6HU0iJlMrejnZSIFO1sTr0jfenbCCCPa9Ue0CwuJZYjP +PsFnbXwQiZCAp4JV1Q8+lXHy2I5VIkZ6Z4kZIFHYrRpa5axof0ePil0zgJOsygsd4Z9 lOuDOMl6VWTJNZQTk9XV7ChidVavHZc4cszoRE0dhX/4aUbNeqwVRn7+x2VpmbVVa2ZX 4UBvfbdbe/PHZs0n6SgijVfRFF0ztyg6oGcCSybc8F+hPKYKSrmGt8lmKYDHt6+gsDda Nomw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111ZCKDlPW3BYrV7qGTw0ex0VZt1dRAcZQKUaQuKZSas5pRdMjjV vkpsCLR28GWVJBFSx66iQw== X-Received: by 10.99.55.83 with SMTP id g19mr4379730pgn.243.1499872054998; Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (76-14-207-240.or.wavecable.com. [76.14.207.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s64sm6648650pfd.77.2017.07.12.08.07.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 08:07:26 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: "jonathan.ribas@fraudbuster.mobi" Cc: users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20170712080726.605cde41@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <9b28bd6e-2982-acfc-8c5a-2cb1e3ed52c9@fraudbuster.mobi> References: <9b28bd6e-2982-acfc-8c5a-2cb1e3ed52c9@fraudbuster.mobi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Issue with i40e on X710: rte_eth_dev_count returns 0, i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities returns I40E_ERR_UNKNOWN_PHY X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:07:36 -0000 On Wed, 12 Jul 2017 15:50:58 +0200 "jonathan.ribas@fraudbuster.mobi" wrote: > Hi all, > > We got a bunch of X710 NIC and cant use them with our custom app. > As the topic says, rte_eth_dev_count returns 0. And after a quick > investigation with testpmd, we saw that i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities > returns 'I40E_ERR_UNKNOWN_PHY'. With I40E always make sure and update firmware as first step. Last I checked, some Intel NIC's do not support 3rd party SFP modules.