From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Andrew Bainbridge <andbain@microsoft.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Low level understanding of mbufs needed.
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:47:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170906184745.711bc096@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR83MB0220FF34AE789E0245EA01ADAE910@HE1PR83MB0220.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 10:44:02 +0000
Andrew Bainbridge <andbain@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I'm a newbie. I want to learn more about to use mbufs to achieve the best throughput. My application is something like a VPN server. In pseudo code:
>
> while 1:
> pkt = recv()
> if pkt.ip.daddr == CLIENT:
> new_pkt = encap(pkt)
> else:
> new_pkt = decap(pkt)
> send(new_pkt)
>
> Where encap() prepends an IP and UDP header, and decap() does the opposite.
>
> Most of each packet I send is the same as one I just received. Is it possible to do the send without having to allocate a new mbuf and memcpy into it?
>
> I want to learn more about how the system works at the low level.
>
> My guess of how it works is that the NIC reads in a packet from the Ethernet cable and writes it into its on-chip SRAM. Once it has enough data buffered, or enough time has elapsed it does a PCIe write request to copy the data into system RAM. The simplest scheme would be to have a single large circular buffer in system RAM and for the packets to be written nose-to-tail into that buffer.
> Does DPDK do that? I guess not. I guess the supported cards all support scatter/gather, which AFAICT means the NICs are smart enough to understand an array of pointers to buffers.
>
> So what then? I have many 1500 byte buffers allocated, and I give the NIC an array of pointers to those buffers. The NIC then "scatters" the input stream into these buffers, one packet per buffer.
>
> I guess the best scheme for my application would be if I could tell the NIC to always leave 30 bytes or so of headroom on each packet, so that I can prepend the extra headers in the encap case. Can I request that when I configure the mbufs?
>
> If you can point me to some kind of tutorial or blog post that covers this area, that would also be helpful.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
You are heading off on a tangent. That is not how DPDK works.
DPDK works like Linux and FreeBSD kernel.
Either read the documentation or look at how examples work.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-04 10:44 Andrew Bainbridge
2017-09-04 11:03 ` Andriy Berestovskyy
2017-09-07 1:47 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170906184745.711bc096@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=andbain@microsoft.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).