From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-f182.google.com (mail-pl1-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF581B027 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 16:47:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id w14-v6so2702999plp.6 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 07:47:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cV/LjYz3YhJdVKwYNH2PmxHdhdOwid0FvFiT28940a0=; b=KP/xd1BjA2Xv/zkU296WoHDPrmmQW0yiialKo4ft2ypR3/qin1lrEX5Ph2D4Kz59zj OJoMePw6oN5xo3LiWig6A+nEDXsbYs6Wg5HkJy05iEQjQBzq52IgxrH28g+6yKjD72d/ uIem7br/v0/zPjFX4cu/KFOBKdcHNZ2Kn63f05ghCZVn15nVAEUkFf8s34CAbW+DXcgT QpBrk0j4ldrVCMXahb9ZLdogVBlHpxRtuC47phruKyX3iCFYODnl29twEuzZ9T9+mwbt MEVY4wkgZelrFpgyez0nxgNPj6mEXE7mJAJBryOm0WBbC9bQfVmEcm1FT48ohVNWd+W/ +ZvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cV/LjYz3YhJdVKwYNH2PmxHdhdOwid0FvFiT28940a0=; b=atLnqtuVzviyFPPs1ZzVVFNpEavgld04bPnZUFghtsyOiu2so+AShMm67Fko93kX3u 6tpSFe0Wm//Q/A9JUD9Emc5ZfBAZqQ8dySVJZz1lOsBLIaGVzKbVidK9Zx9G7zmj6LuE A7iWfR9qxJrt8yRqdsV5mpSL9mEHl4nIF9ylsQpUIj4ekPh3iandBXkM6/V5CaGV4uYk Dy+q7s+b2wsWnSNRY7Pupoxe7oIrO9WaOdT1XwJSDvyFjzzh36jcd6hcad+oVgF697cO hyij6ihNTEWqi249sL4SZnK7KC/DYgaTjCkGdp7wgWYL8mx4uEMcma0mjQNljsaqOTMP Lr7w== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51Bey+wgD+5gzBWoV5mbjrMOWgkYhxqBfqHObX1sJ1JgCVN01wCt jsgmxKjJGyrloftTRY4Owt4iLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0Vdby+Ien8bEcJMFfTfQlONfvs0nERx7yzbuYRKOIc9JHdqEWW/Mx/x4LF5PeNICsBfkj/1Vw/Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:7488:: with SMTP id h8-v6mr7649248pll.16.1536850028731; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (204-195-22-127.wavecable.com. [204.195.22.127]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y69-v6sm6389227pfd.36.2018.09.13.07.47.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 07:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 07:47:01 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Charles Ju Cc: users@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20180913074701.3290d8c2@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Using dpdk libraries without EAL X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 14:47:10 -0000 On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 16:05:33 +0800 Charles Ju wrote: > Hi, > > I have developed my own packet capture code and would like to just use the > dpdk libraries such as the ACL Library and mempool libraries. In this case, > does these libraries require the EAL? If you are going to extract bits and pieces then you are going to have to look at the internals of the source code. And deal with future changes. I don't think it is fair to developers to expect that cherry picking libraries will work.