DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Concept clarification on NICS with multiple queues
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 08:53:23 -0800
Message-ID: <20211222085323.4b9d894e@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Tq66X1zo3M63mkieztDa6fvhQ4ROhQo_OF3_KJTQKCysq7QA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 13:22:46 -0500
fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote:

> My NIC has 32 RX and 32 TX queues.
> 
> Now given this API,
> 
> static uint16_t rte_eth_tx_burst ( uint16_t  port_id,
> uint16_t  queue_id,
> struct rte_mbuf <https://doc.dpdk.org/api/structrte__mbuf.html> **  tx_pkts,
> uint16_t  nb_pkts
> )
> I gather the most natural approach for efficient packet transmissions is,
> 
> - assign one core to TX on a given port, queue since I/O through different
> queues is essentially independent
> - arrange packets in memory buffers so packets for the same queue are in
> the same buffer
> 
> The RX side is much the same:
> 
> static uint16_t rte_eth_rx_burst ( uint16_t  port_id,
> uint16_t  queue_id,
> struct rte_mbuf <https://doc.dpdk.org/api/structrte__mbuf.html> **  rx_pkts,
> const uint16_t  nb_pkts
> )
> - assign one core to RX on a given port, queue since I/O through different
> queues is essentially independent of other queues
> 
> Is this pretty much the starting place?
> 
> Now, my NIC also has RSS (elided):
> 
> ethtool -x eth0
> 
> RSS hash key:
> 
> e8:27:27:e4:d9:fa:e4:1e:c6:89:67:95:52:4b:7a:41:3a:a6:68:5f:12:ec:4c:2f:51:18:a0:9b:bb:e1:7a:fb:a7:fb:7f:68:39:47:c2:83
> 
> RSS hash function:
> 
>     toeplitz: on
> 
>     xor: off
> 
>     crc32: off
> 
> But doesn't specifying the queue_id on RX/TX burst functions undercut RSS?
> That is, nowhere is there an opportunity for the NIC to determine which
> queue TX or RX go to since it was told at the outset?

RSS is Receive Side Scaling. It applies only to which queue will receive
a packet. For transmit, RSS is not relevant. 

Queues are not thread safe. You can only have a single core using a queue
at a time. A typical architecture is to assign one transmit queue per core.  
And have receive queues associated with a single core. See the DPDK
examples code.

Application chooses the TX queue, NIC determines the RX queue based on
configuration. See rte_flow for how more complex Rx queue management can be done.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-12-22 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20 18:22 fwefew 4t4tg
2021-12-22 16:53 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211222085323.4b9d894e@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=7532yahoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK usage discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/users \
		users@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index users

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.users


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git