From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B39A0547
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2022 17:01:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53CE40156;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2022 17:01:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-pg1-f176.google.com (mail-pg1-f176.google.com
 [209.85.215.176])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9A44014F
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon,  5 Dec 2022 17:01:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pg1-f176.google.com with SMTP id s196so10881573pgs.3
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:01:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date
 :message-id:reply-to;
 bh=t7QFxyhCI7IYb3xXh81rcQM8QXzcx3kwQykzHD8WYPQ=;
 b=l7XUrDlcDu/pAOcAqcUmkQM+oxjuI7Uo+Bt4Xztz2orNXQFYhNtII3Et/KWvVQE4va
 +hPu788DHzBhl5wQzOKdI4EvAhd6dK9HtAFvFeElOxHIWFizxWy46j6lR9eA11tujK8r
 l7d/NQTYGfhoWJiS3yYcOxgBEL0bVbUdO9v5ZPJvpgJtGiRpuYOcvK4SW7Ooeq3NP9cY
 KThh6EVd+DCaDKL827UfHORLOg0Baa9YfFaABo7ElfpKB+20mgC2LiGrBR880/DZTBlx
 A1h/m5qyLX5Zwu50vMnW1Ibj4XvYHK8Wkeqf5FHt+gWFUinHXVc25j6PAMjZ1cH0IXoy
 WXaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to
 :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc
 :subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
 bh=t7QFxyhCI7IYb3xXh81rcQM8QXzcx3kwQykzHD8WYPQ=;
 b=DDUZentHPL14i4rJTZzGRZP+m2AllHyQsNEachcolMwE99ecDvkd7qTaLm/Jck8B4m
 UMhU5cqQlHDxyOScYiI+qJ/5k21J7krxx7jvPPlNWOQupKrCaDLoaFl445iSwj8nfqLr
 m3Qnj8nHtGRU8leJpT1uEMRyAHRF13DrEIovWjrv/doD4a6GVwwjMP1jKqy8kCPW7HXk
 z3YR5LPhLy7MLYVVVb3BOKAokSxUjeLPl5/TSn12j9ypaDpmjMnPEYLAZ97oM28RSG0B
 vxMtgsU0GCssLDUb8+n3GJPEWtSUo1K6TFOcuYKbjZj0Hkia3i2XTkDUbqKXQbaPKnZZ
 srNQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmZMUSmBYbZv7xVOfaagqxr3WyJvqmNOsoHxp6sO92pAB7LHsLP
 Q/N0enq/wWu/7CqbETYz4P6Y6HTz8leV72ouQ0k=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4uclD0yp5kONemYY2psDjlJrBDpqv9hobCXMTEH5ayezGZ5tx2mjoUCNYWlewZCEIC4RF51w==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:121a:0:b0:477:6ccb:9f1d with SMTP id
 h26-20020a63121a000000b004776ccb9f1dmr58753525pgl.537.1670256095508; 
 Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
 z188-20020a6233c5000000b0056d7cc80ea4sm10004688pfz.110.2022.12.05.08.01.34
 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
 Mon, 05 Dec 2022 08:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:01:33 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: John Bize <john.bize@cantada.com>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: USB device support in DPDK
Message-ID: <20221205080133.28dc4080@hermes.local>
In-Reply-To: <2324603.NG923GbCHz@thomas>
References: <b2da035f-72fe-48a2-ab79-dba4997fa5b0@cantada.com>
 <2324603.NG923GbCHz@thomas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org

On Mon, 05 Dec 2022 10:07:44 +0100
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 02/12/2022 14:01, John Bize:
> > Will DPDK support USB-Ethernet devices?  
> 
> If there is a need and an advantage for USB devices
> to be supported in DPDK, why not?
> 
> In general, DPDK supports what is contributed and maintained.
> 
> 

One recent Linux kernel thread was about removing all the RNDIS
USB devices because there are fundamental security problems with
the protocol.