From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FF141DCD for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 17:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B89D40EDB; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 17:52:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415F040A8A for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2023 17:52:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id a9so11056217plh.11 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:52:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1678121536; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QM7f1NN6xAqycHI8ZS3z/0cnO/S74byLNAlHU0NJ0LM=; b=tWkkargbq9YhuRMCGyOLjT0mmuowUUUR8ADlTEH64RZ3/g1xdjgFlx0blH5fIWUfLe MaUV/Wv2PZmzCB4ooMmZrQVXM5nygPJTKrHxQGTClcf7UK3rHBuBVMHU0WqQbdxfjpBV uEPkfUyUtWexz8QD4rDLelBuAYbZWTY+Ayb7j08OhSjfgny7pzHA9F0NuL2c7YRkltXp 21Ir1zmvySEfCFg8pPudsLh80Q1SRNKO+Crz3X8gshmlYQnthl26tdYSOxjpA8x7FAPK zmWNqxvc8fNgn6fHplxIVVqmJNhq9uS7bwogfJwwih703vOQSjpp3iHZGVShV/6O7ZMV qFhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678121536; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QM7f1NN6xAqycHI8ZS3z/0cnO/S74byLNAlHU0NJ0LM=; b=vS4HIKMUKNmRztXW+g3SGPl0SklDjh35FZVxKJdZ4kt8665Ug/naSTE6l8h15hgva5 kkQwyorG/hwf4TKmJ3GNsgBOAiXSCubutPq+gDIzQVuYfNuUra5C5dJqle+vEqCovGEC PmnkVcE5PHPe58oODw7PtgG2yYwlC0VL0a4e7t5EdYOiMk0eDTO0eniFIupF/ZFu+ziH Wjh9aziZqV8wN5bLkoHldcc/N7jvoFcZnA0Jby3GRBO+u9B+1eWL/x8KeqT3ZKSlI+e8 reUEaM+I/EXJ+yIwO4xw5gcUU7G6EHzEO+kFXBjwvoStoIPMNc2vVuvsMiFxn05rQGWX HfdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKW1k5OK/jBPWbtAVBLNnFaZEAGacalFqSuKDqcQV5J6nzfPXt25 QDHaJ0N6HOC+8PsY5P/lEXeMPkX9TAcOcZfxCqFtLg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set8cTqBSb8AaYPvSBWr7CNv/tazSbTORMa7f8xNR5LdW/Y+/65D2jbYY5Zwg5KYDFEwRoLzbfA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:1954:b0:237:50b6:9843 with SMTP id 20-20020a17090a195400b0023750b69843mr11144989pjh.0.1678121536168; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:52:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b4-20020a17090acc0400b002308e6e645bsm6194620pju.49.2023.03.06.08.52.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 08:52:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 08:52:15 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger To: RANJEETH NEDUNURI Cc: users@dpdk.org, "dineshramesh46@gmail.com" Subject: Re: Dpdk test_pmd with pdump Message-ID: <20230306085215.59451000@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:55:21 +0530 RANJEETH NEDUNURI wrote: > Hi , > I hope you are doing great, I have gone through your patches related to > dpdk,I am working on dpdk, while executing dpdk testpmd and pdump we are > getting errors. > We are using dpdk 22.07 version and virtual nic on top of physical nic in > Linux This is not a supported version, please use 22.11. > We are following this link: > https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/dpdk-packet-capture-framework.html Intel article is out of date, it pre-dates meson build etc. The current docs for pdump is on website: https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/tools/pdump.html > Error: EAL: failed to parse device "EAL: failed to parse device > "vdev:net_pcap_rx_0" EAL: Failed to hotplug add device on primary" > > And one more how to give pcap file input to testpmd. > > Could you please answer this we very thankful to you. You may find that the newer DPDK dumpcap application is easier to work with. It has less dependencies and more options. https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/tools/dumpcap.html