From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED2742911 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ED840DDC; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pj1-f52.google.com (mail-pj1-f52.google.com [209.85.216.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E7E740A81 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 19:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pj1-f52.google.com with SMTP id c3so6024895pjg.1 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; t=1681147859; x=1683739859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=B5x1nkhHIb5oAJcpGYSkIAALPpFDbQ+/jjVSoi6y14I=; b=XefYyqEmzRclp6BNOi8vtFJhdh3xdFP4MAszwG/tYxFcc6y3QXPEqZCHvWwXt2Q5sg tzpwr5Y86UQIBfENfStKkPexMa2VFqhM/mOeLOieFBfGq6fe1PDqdwf9QokUTg+2gVQC 1uzUfr/qgTriPtfDXUeH5yK+Dw75xntxZYWQ68NJWz1NowEbiXO0CnZIYnB4bOAGPIIJ lsBBO62MKgWKjO84q9wwUQtcS34J7abNpmw0HJAhTDe8f+VhchED0RUY6U0sVi0AoMkR 0zz2LBcG3LO8OYcnmluNhYR9AT1AU4rgkzWpX75qmkZba6o606+Q5dKE4OyUO/Ef+7ii 3JSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681147859; x=1683739859; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=B5x1nkhHIb5oAJcpGYSkIAALPpFDbQ+/jjVSoi6y14I=; b=QjsMBoGmfSe01KuIBxPWgCScqJm6/nsWvCHJoMsXXboUccrmFP30yfpOd5mg9hVvZ1 3GEORkTqZ/Ue5CEemLOktlhauZEhME5VmIqfDY0YILqsPeWS2gOMKCeKDSX/zFZ5jen0 O4LkUy/uL//91UsJqggHTOwkUk4Cqcs3lcftvuNpsZWwmiv5mPCeC+FiKZl+oicy49Vg Kaw0lSC2j6Mt4DhzjEZsEizCEZWDIfjX4GAOGkGiskWV82gD8o1kYti6PvW/hdKAR81y g+oec5teFn73wlJH8Tafq9yhS9cHRKVX3R2wbOUFLYt6fJxb5fZ8sBgv+AqILcNe6o7+ 3MbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f71uLQvhZI7AeZabzXZmxW1nJ+87RbhdHh0EXOM0b7lGXt77RI P+DgkP6ALyQT3Ze4lA0bIxKpxg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YnyjjGv7a6ReLWzrcNIuNtkO67ozpWFywpRs0i0ybTTRMbePwGrJhGD7R1US2iRH7bz6/qDA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c947:b0:1a2:79f0:f059 with SMTP id i7-20020a170902c94700b001a279f0f059mr15995647pla.28.1681147859238; Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-120-218.wavecable.com. [204.195.120.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11-20020a170902900b00b00196807b5189sm7978652plp.292.2023.04.10.10.30.58 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 10:30:57 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> Cc: users@dpdk.org Subject: Re: DPDK and full TCP-IP stack Message-ID: <20230410103057.74121cc5@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 10 Apr 2023 13:08:15 -0400 fwefew 4t4tg <7532yahoo@gmail.com> wrote: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/65841190/does-dpdk-provide-a-native-tcp-ip-network-stack-implemetation > > points out there's no native TCP-IP in DPDK stack until v20.11. We're at > 23.03. Was this completed? No. There was never a full TCP-IP stack in DPDK. Doing one correctly, and supporting it, is a difficult effort. There are many one off projects doing TCP over DPDK. And FD.IO has a TCP host stack https://fd.io/docs/vpp/v2101/whatisvpp/hoststack.html