From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9254233C for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF724402C2; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016ED402A3 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 17:15:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1c5cd27b1acso36725795ad.2 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1696864528; x=1697469328; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=G9+C0fmT1tO7kNvsMQ+sh2AC4DSARZ97vkFj7pgLVf0=; b=E3ZD8QKwwYRuhoMUUv4G0rBUXN4u7qbPGhHfRqb6t4HpGNx147Pj4CKWVP+e8s6dB9 GKlKw5En4WxS3oMdnn4v8PpdFj8nPzsO3ylGY73DYuJl1ZlCwfcOkL4z9PlDST2c7Bsd YlvnK2yT27nj7gAIXHV6AD20Z5RlAB5lwHHF//MuSlPMPT0uj5ugkC4XeFWKkjm0fvvZ mheTJEpT9uJxMk+xqLNBnOzYQsTtigb9rV/+wnWqjtQYNVD/3imPFx/vhExEBk4n41ov VaH8XevDKTc07wSxMSkWVcmgc3pU9BtH6NKeDWDFNmqI8qPkrT7rlt1kBz/NSQCPO3hG wx2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696864528; x=1697469328; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=G9+C0fmT1tO7kNvsMQ+sh2AC4DSARZ97vkFj7pgLVf0=; b=QV6mPv2a9caQb4Wt6TBGmOgar3TtFf7MLrENbkawQVDMGGxSIzLJT6bRlwkqCuqXBa 4Enx43CadKDaG5DuH5Uc5Nyp5ebYlNT+86RQxy9GSbTNFc7VQtCtGwK8ERaS/XQ1GrSE JEfiiY2IV8mkYTC4Ezl59UEOaTIF03fQnooVw5hQncp+deGZSNRNe3X2eq6H9M7XKrJk S4EAFg0aAdvLHsV1xrsI+DCpF//xZoo4E9ZxPWlr3rfIxAJ3DGEL7OJUBJz8KFpq71wL hfj2d8jUxwuGLcCouIwon3K5Igl/cKtQZTFYWZBgjWAxG76+tcTAwaTR8JSI5Pf5PVec ihdg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzLFYT4rRJm2Z9/TP79fIN5txAk91jUlM73z3cgkXSiE7NStjoi VepG8y+1ADfxc3UMPqS666MJOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFVzB0gUPNMUTo0BkzZXlgIFK+Pzbp97788kfvCVp9oNn/oPxVzUYE9mRZYQdFk6D7Z8mVNNw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c8:b0:1c8:952c:603e with SMTP id i8-20020a17090332c800b001c8952c603emr10775805plr.49.1696864528162; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hermes.local (204-195-126-68.wavecable.com. [204.195.126.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7-20020a170902ce8700b001c5fd2a28d3sm9719731plg.28.2023.10.09.08.15.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 08:15:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 08:15:26 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Kouilakonda Anudattu Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: net/tap: eBPF failed to load BPF section and failed to create flows for TAP device Message-ID: <20231009081526.01fee12f@hermes.local> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, 9 Oct 2023 07:04:49 +0000 Kouilakonda Anudattu wrote: > I'm adding some additional details to provide more context. I'm encountering this issue on Azure/Hyper-V platform with the existing DPDK-22.11.1 tap_bpf_insns.h byte-code. Unless your use case demands rte_flow, use the netvsc PMD. It has better performance.