DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: madhukar mythri <madhukar.mythri@gmail.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: Failed to load eBPF byte-code on TAP device
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:39:24 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231116103924.137be051@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUNki3w51pfA9_eBrs0NBuGroD6LDB+c_XW0TTPX1ZHXsh7Zw@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 13:41:27 +0530
madhukar mythri <madhukar.mythri@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
> 
> I had added some logs in the BPF verifier of Kernel code, to print the
> number of instructions processed and error-code returned as follows:
> ============================
> logs # dmesg |tail -n 20
> [   76.318101] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999989 insn
> [   76.318102] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999990 insn
> [   76.318103] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999991 insn
> [   76.318104] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999992 insn
> [   76.318105] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999993 insn
> [   76.318106] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999994 insn
> [   76.318107] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999995 insn
> [   76.318108] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999996 insn
> [   76.318109] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999997 insn
> [   76.318110] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999998 insn
> [   76.318111] #### do_check: instructions Processed 999999 insn
> [   76.318112] #### do_check: instructions Processed 1000000 insn
> [   76.318113] BPF program is too large. Processed 1000001 insn
> [   76.318209] ########## bpf_check:  do_check_main done..: ret: -7
> [   76.318210] ########## bpf_check:  bpf_prog_offload_finalize done..:
> ret: -7
> [   76.318212] ########## bpf_check:  check_max_stack_depth done..: ret: -7
> [   76.318212] ########## bpf_check:  fixup_call_args done..: ret: -7
> [   76.318224] ########## bpf_check:  end..: ret: -7
> [   76.318224] ##########  BPF  bpf_check return err: -7..:
> =========================
> 
> Only these logs which I add in the Kernel-code were printed and do not see
> any other Kernel-logs.
> 
> Thanks,
> Madhuker.
> 
> On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 8:49 PM Stephen Hemminger <
> stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:  
> 
> > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 15:38:55 +0530
> > madhukar mythri <madhukar.mythri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > On the RHEL9.2 with DPDK 22.11.1 version, DPDK primary application failed
> > > to add RSS flow on TAP sub-device, when loading the TAP BPF byte-code
> > > instructions.
> > >
> > > This "struct bpf_insn l3_l4_hash_insns[]" array(from file:
> > > drivers/net/tap/tap_bpf_insns.h) is in eBPF bytecode instructions format,
> > > this eBPF failed to load on TAP PMD with the following error:
> > >
> > > =====================
> > > rss_add_actions(): Failed to load BPF section 'l3_l4' (7): Argument list
> > > too long.
> > > net_failsafe: Failed to create a flow on sub_device 1."
> > > =====================
> > > On Kernel-version:  5.15.0 #9 SMP PREEMPT
> > > Arch: x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > When added some debug logs on Kernel BPF verifier code, we could see that
> > > instruction processed were reached to 1 Million.
> > > But, the Byte code has only 1698 instructions only. Why the Kernel BPF
> > > verifier is processing beyond 1,698 instructions ?
> > >
> > > The same byte-code(with DPDK-22.11.1) worked well with RHEL8.x and not
> > > working in RHEL-9.x version.
> > >
> > > Does anybody faced such issues ?
> > > Please let me know how to debug such issues on Byte-code.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Madhukar.  
> >
> > Is there anything in the kernel log?

I suspect a kernel bug.
The kernel BPF API is not stable, and RHEL can and does modify the kernel.
Likely a Redhat bug.
Try with recent TAP fixes (in 23.11-rc3). 


      reply	other threads:[~2023-11-16 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-15 10:08 madhukar mythri
2023-11-15 15:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-11-16  8:11   ` madhukar mythri
2023-11-16 18:39     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231116103924.137be051@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=madhukar.mythri@gmail.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).