DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mohammad Malihi Aqdam <Aqdam@graph-inc.ir>
To: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
Cc: Mojtaba Tarihi <mtarihi@graph-inc.ir>
Subject: How to ensure packets of a flow will be distributed in order by rte_distributor
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 13:32:15 +0000
Message-ID: <21b7b6d44218408cb080641f16e02400@graph-inc.ir> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1891 bytes --]

we are working on an application which uses rte_distributor to distribute packets based on 5 tuple extracted from packets. Each flow associates with an object (e.g connection) which will be used by worker logical cores. The packets of the flow must be processed in order and no connection instance must be accessed by two or more workers at the same time.
The underlying data structure as a flow manager is of type std::unordeted_map<unsigned, connection*> (key is the hash value obtained from nic rss offload based on 5 tuple).
To ensure that a connection instance will not be accessed by two worker cores, each connection class has a member named ref_cnt. Before processing the packets of a specific connection, the ref_cnt member value increases and after the completion the member decreases (using rte_atomic16_inc(&connection->ref_cnt) and rte_atomic16_dec(&connection->ref_cnt)). So the value of the ref_cnt before processing of each packet must be zero (i.e the connection is not is use). But according to test results at some iterations the value of ref_cnt is 1 which determines that the related instance has been distributed to another worker core.
According to Packet Distributor Library documentation (https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/packet_distrib_lib.html) No packet ordering guarantees are made about packets which do not share a common packet tag and it seems that the ordering will be preserved for packets of a particular flow (with the same tag) but the test results shows that the packets of a flow may be distributed to two distinct workers.
I want to know, if the distributor decides to distribute the packets of a flow while the older related packets still are under process in a worker, whether the distributor waits until the processing of older packets finishes or it distribute the new packets to another worker.

Thanks for considering my request


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2412 bytes --]

                 reply	other threads:[~2022-04-04 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21b7b6d44218408cb080641f16e02400@graph-inc.ir \
    --to=aqdam@graph-inc.ir \
    --cc=mtarihi@graph-inc.ir \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK usage discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/users/0 users/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 users users/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/users \
		users@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index users

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.users


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git