From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9C558A for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:16:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id g23so21684631wme.1 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:16:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+E50s8ZhRc20kbOXeQX2lei+mDxUoLYGD0RcYhB+3vQ=; b=PVOwzeDRjwL+ktNJ0JM0XhGqAJ6OqgYmHVLzNbdZauVQ1NvAz05L+Tz1feVTFA4Z7E EL2l22a8mfi392+nT49rpDN+R9opOCr/RGdW63+UkYBEnmydROxDLXUryrxO417uAe5B EZDF6Hos2G09s1NXNdP/M2ucivfl4OkrXgOumg5sH+pEhl5wr9ol8otGOLSXoy2NGmbY SdL+hR9QrRyaX8wjLC8KZPmsf7OG97jnZQ2iozq+vkMLroCBurPIRncKIfpoNOpv3nN5 gRLqXd+xFc/Fu3wh8EW98YgnKYGJmibutFRhdetxuLqfCjyLcz9/ngLvjtUCzatS+wBy dpCA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+E50s8ZhRc20kbOXeQX2lei+mDxUoLYGD0RcYhB+3vQ=; b=ImLV6rpumQFd6xhAEXGAF//idoHsueBMxgmNHk+zz0NTrQ+/4mFoirsVPLwPA/lKmS 3uRk3nsk4T64G1+VDi2dyMJryZET7sVGFuNdne7T32M9OG9So8T6wLrg2j//B1eJKUqx A9v9oKceHqgnfF09IBeAD4HB/bmDaaQgrZ5ZUcGSusN1j6z5wa21Gx9RvJpZNnX05SYi CeAFEvVCnKMpuN0XbY7Bd5RI/qXPEzVTms6VYDPzRgKKU4UnU1+6bSIoevEWNord2VPH yZbBbI1H8v1vWT/rb2LNbPtVnEY7GMYAwUDn4o6HflVnepNdpK/M4mRyF5o5rm3pW9Ci Ej9w== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvctETp/P8lTS4cafRsnfTOH9soJh42m4tTsplSBBcRQG9qkrs8lLwErMe6PRINKna1o X-Received: by 10.28.191.130 with SMTP id o2mr22660504wmi.97.1479457004390; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m9sm2034357wma.0.2016.11.18.00.16.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:16:43 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: James Huang Cc: users@dpdk.org, "Wiles, Keith" Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 09:16:42 +0100 Message-ID: <2288577.64UbDlIlDh@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <24E2F452-E943-46FF-81F2-119DAF776C40@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK Linux kernel version requirement X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:16:44 -0000 2016-11-17 11:46, James Huang: > CentOS release 6.5 (Final) [...] > According to the test results, could I say DPDK 32bit applications are > GOOD to run on Linux 64bit kernel v2.6.32? CentOS has a lot of backports so it is not really a 2.6.32 kernel. It is good to know that DPDK 16.07 runs on CentOS 6.5, but we cannot conclude on other 2.6.32 distributions.