From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C80A0A0C for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:13:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDAF4067C; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:13:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66440395 for ; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:13:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D71CC7; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 08:13:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 30 Jan 2021 08:13:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= W/8cEkUl3w8exolWonpJnjGn3gNqlkMle8xUFSnSrtg=; b=rJVX8uzC/8k3ks0B K8K7G1Xns2NlBgK/K1W6FMgpbjusYuf1h3+ngMDG6AU1rKLujBRp54/co9zPksuO 9PUiKz+tgc2N0c/czxonLRlvqF9S/7V1+kjOY67mmSFdJVgNjLdyFP6R48xDtRqx e796FMElbGLONvQTssN4xFRH5yuk0b0Gp3EVvVp6D23Kq/CRb1tqUVF5Wp/uCr82 Wy9ahhJSXKntdY6r6D2szDGRVuAum7ktPK6YBbd4tijMFRQgCcHPIPFxHA8jZHSR NR6k+TWhH6MubvvH7dVXWCieBr0ENt8WMz+sNomLa9l5ouTpvcjD28U1aJbLaHnt Obs8Lw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=W/8cEkUl3w8exolWonpJnjGn3gNqlkMle8xUFSnSr tg=; b=T/KTKICQQ4GvW8kM98OIl6QashM5GiT5D7gWD6oomrKyKstzAgi0bshGn kF2CXvtYwnAEknEkjv+THVoNSwuQ4sqELHEztOGp/1CTmGWFV9OLnTK+PJoPtCIm g4W5+kYsiFWHIka8dViDhHo7USFpLhcfm5LEoGgfytgEM+lYs7WLLieXdJKlBXog Z031lQL1g9SN6hcHcKtebOoZuB+8MxYcUZ1I4Cr7aAjZQ25X8VcdC5aswgkH3g6l vIrZ1GFHatDmyKybqULg8wgg1dJTUSOTN8FHgxMasd1DWddpSSj0KWH1WhZLMFDN JWiqrvzMm+cW1GUjROT3bfFMW2yTw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfeeggdehtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 775281080064; Sat, 30 Jan 2021 08:13:33 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Slava Ovsiienko , Carsten Andrich Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 14:13:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3452993.ScWioT7nxq@thomas> In-Reply-To: <7a341d4b-5d39-7770-98a8-bd03ade463b3@tu-ilmenau.de> References: <43ddc3a8-a48f-0930-a2da-9e2fcdde1b98@tu-ilmenau.de> <7a341d4b-5d39-7770-98a8-bd03ade463b3@tu-ilmenau.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] MLX5: Using packet send scheduling / packet pacing X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" 30/01/2021 11:54, Carsten Andrich: > Hi Slava, > > thank you for the prompt response. I think the requirements for Packet > Pacing should be added to Table 34.2(?) of the MLX5 docs [1]. +1 for improving the doc