From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Received: from mga05.intel.com (mga05.intel.com [192.55.52.43])
by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D596DE3
for <users@dpdk.org>; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 17:26:17 +0100 (CET)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38])
by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384;
18 Jan 2019 08:26:16 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,491,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="268179254"
Received: from irsmsx151.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.192.59])
by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2019 08:26:15 -0800
Received: from irsmsx156.ger.corp.intel.com (10.108.20.68) by
IRSMSX151.ger.corp.intel.com (163.33.192.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
id 14.3.408.0; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:14 +0000
Received: from irsmsx101.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.213]) by
IRSMSX156.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.3.156]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000;
Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:14 +0000
From: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
To: Changchun Zhang <changchun.zhang@oracle.com>, "Pathak, Pravin"
<pravin.pathak@intel.com>, "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>
CC: "Trahe, Fiona" <fiona.trahe@intel.com>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-users] Run-to-completion or Pipe-line for QAT PMD in DPDK
Thread-Index: AQHUrriXjo1+JKJBjkaH5GQU9xCtbKW0/cFQgAAZIACAABUogIAACJIw
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:13 +0000
Message-ID: <348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B435896CD528@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <03fd164b-112b-4e44-a5b0-15c6e3703662@default>
<348A99DA5F5B7549AA880327E580B435896CD08F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>
<168A68C163D584429EF02A476D5274424DEA9B7C@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com>
<5e87ae90-94b9-4e85-9172-46b95365ec36@default>
In-Reply-To: <5e87ae90-94b9-4e85-9172-46b95365ec36@default>
Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNmZkYWI5NWYtNzhhNi00MTQ2LWE2NTktZDhiMTZjOGU5ZTgxIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiZ3NSSjd6V2hkNlwvQUlCODRpOEY4RVNXaCtqbnNPMVd5SFJGT2V4UU11QWh4WDZaWCs0Tk13WTVmS0tFeWQydVwvIn0=
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.0.400.15
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Run-to-completion or Pipe-line for QAT PMD in DPDK
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
<mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
<mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:18 -0000
Hi Alex,
> [changchun] In the same thread, but how about to dequeuer at the beginnin=
g of the thread each time,
> if data presents then processing them, if no data just do other work, and=
equeue the packets at some
> time but does not wait.
> For example:
> While(1)
> {
> Nb_ops =3D dequeuer();
> If(nb_ops > )
> {
> process_dequeued_data();
> continue;
> }
>=20
> Other_work();
> If(ipsec)
> Enqueuer();
> }
> Does it make sense?
[Fiona] It can, though on the first loop ro after a queit time youll proabl=
y get very few back on first and second dequeue as
It'll be called immediately after the enqueue. Once it gets busy that could=
be ok though