From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6441BA034E for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 00:05:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AEE1DB3A; Thu, 7 May 2020 00:05:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BEC1BFE3 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 00:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F605C00D7; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:05:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 06 May 2020 18:05:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= 1UM4lJZjcjoPI0dU+tQY18ZsJ1oU8Ruk6Ei+SfjFi50=; b=qff0Y/zvsM4GL+jO cv2XKWgVP5X7sLNL3DwUci1b2f4sYK+KU8KvaXC2EVb6kIpo5+ybg001qRN4mNU6 RDj4GSYucMhfHvKUMyXpjnndE18JvK4oUF4wrK1WI9GfvWD5DIlMDbkjBv3uvxeE b8h7TheEvTITObQSp6HXaRbRsTKp4sggx9b5CTg64VPF8to90jvhN/WX6KrPabUa wajQVgjlDh1R3rAZswq/f9dGU4231K+4Hlf60hkitaY53I98pywgruUovXeI1pZw iemxWcFQ1oNCBkAJIcJgHy/SCHaNZoy5QNT0SClo/J7RGJa2UO/qGhqCS5xiug3Y zwXJjQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1UM4lJZjcjoPI0dU+tQY18ZsJ1oU8Ruk6Ei+SfjFi 50=; b=gmX1xby436bYoWhTCIIaWycputJ+W5cRj73VIZQIbRp2dBKt+oohOLia2 qJGu3ULnpTmGWLQZgBXr1og7CNjlfasUiSPaPw80QZktI6VCQBDgVZke56KfL3eu WO359JR4w/yOCFcdd8dahwfgXRGf2NqwscVF6R8rsP7UrvcAYLkrwls7KjyOR9xy 2ekLUx3YIv9p/hvoce8jQ9kp2w/pgNINAOx2feeHVlTBIO65FRjcPk7pfEmjwmsa 0zpSyXkWEAfmBDBFnBoAO2S1JBkLnqjPMj6Ksin6YDsdPo/rejpy6200rCLxcE69 ebQWpARTtJUxCEwjw2moKeugV+LfA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrjeelgddtgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 150E9306612B; Wed, 6 May 2020 18:05:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Liwu Liu Cc: users@dpdk.org, erezf@mellanox.com, kiranv@mellanox.com, rasland@mellanox.com, asafp@mellanox.com Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 00:05:26 +0200 Message-ID: <3620277.fW5hKsROvD@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1753687.1xdlsreqCQ@xps> References: <8e9c1a6b5c3148ecbaba453652bce127@fortinet.com> <1753687.1xdlsreqCQ@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] mlx5 PMD fails to receive certain icmpv6 multicast X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" 26/03/2020 22:11, Thomas Monjalon: > 06/03/2020 01:45, Liwu Liu: > > Hi Team, > > > > I am using the mlx5/100G in KVM guest. The host shows this PCI vfNIC is provisioned to the guest: > > "17:01.1 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5 Virtual Function]" > > > > I am using DPDK 19.11 with kind of standard configurations, and when DPDK application runs I still have the kernel mlx5e net device present. I have both promiscuous and all-multicast turned on. > > > > It works fine for IPV4, but for IPV6 it fails. It can receive packets destined to 33:33:00:00:00:02 (IPV6 Router solicitation), but cannot receive packets destined to 33:33:ff:00:00:01 (IPV6 neighbor solicitation for some address). > > > > But if I avoid DPDK, directly use the OFED-4.6 based kernel driver, everything works fine as expected. > > > > I am thinking there is some mismatch happened for MLX5 PMD. Please give some advice/hints. > > Adding Mellanox engineers in Cc list for help. Any update to share please?