From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f181.google.com (mail-pf0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B784A63 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:52:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by pfnn128 with SMTP id n128so16233577pfn.0 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:52:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=versa-networks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=TDFDIyz8l6I36VFYIHOPaxJWjS8U4qpZlPLywzBxtYU=; b=S8ywMsG3Pb1jzwJQDA2VvrfedPFxHvZAfc6xgJNaRwcE7pQO07/RVHtH/NX9Am172d 6hm6btE8sEr8eU5qjLpS+BxvpuFfQ6GamIw2icDBhsa55cY0JJtMWBt+MI6JbRCJ8SbX 7zJ0uYtKFwUsEOlshJKMpkbP6gyOaaCQry4QVzw3LVkG3GyRjHFqEaDq1RdhHVE+vPBp SdaKbSAMvstetIPDDmvLUhzRnlCsUIOov3+/i5iMeLBvqrrSeq3B6ow4eBHgkoIrnfc6 ohje88p+vSYzrCTp+RfeR67dU+8ZQd0niaHvq6vfvr73IMgOWrwaki1Eg1hdrRfDvOrx tnHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=TDFDIyz8l6I36VFYIHOPaxJWjS8U4qpZlPLywzBxtYU=; b=JJobDVD3BRxu5qgE38g1IFYljkfryOU5fHPaYqwLrtK1c08iMp6BTOB8B7e5MrD7kA 4J0e72Gj2ZM3t9Q0gg+Qi6R7P3Wvwuj1ZViDXLnpaDOPJp7JQl7/aL3zVfwCqeRRgY92 OMlZ5ug/3BwGxYahc9viJ272a/Q9+6r02YqnTg72+WL8iiVjEEZefe3vuQvCXEOWMJ1Y dACbse/17g8vTaXmqSDckZ1WCv/JbVIJuvm8wXHXabb251z8vf6J6khxHvBwOOrA/q9/ 6FIBtupDDMzFqU3WxgFe5q/BZhUDFLxe+Zgw4KluU6HKmYLTfAegrot7htVTyhSO/+6x saZg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm24Ca4n7BFfmoEUkesmlMaZD20Ud+xRASV7c0Iwz7Hp2U3D8FTnqo7TQXKqhjFTlnJNj6mZDgfq87UyK9YlUQxXgxlgQ== X-Received: by 10.98.68.201 with SMTP id m70mr7068873pfi.101.1449600740921; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.48] (70-35-56-62.static.wiline.com. [70.35.56.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w1sm6285584pfa.57.2015.12.08.10.52.20 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:52:20 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.1 \(3096.5\)) From: "Sridhar.V.Iyer" In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:52:19 -0800 Message-Id: <3F5AEFA1-F3CF-4343-82D2-200247AF07C4@versa-networks.com> References: To: "Van Haaren, Harry" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3096.5) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: "users@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] e1000 port stats X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:52:22 -0000 Hi Harry, > On Dec 8, 2015, at 2:54 AM, Van Haaren, Harry = wrote: >=20 > This part makes an assumption that because you're not dropping packets = now, means they will never be dropped. This is not a valid assumption: = when a CPU gets overloaded packets will get dropped, which will = invalidate the statistics: we need to find a better solution. Thanks for the clarification. Is the bug that the gorc/gotc registers are not getting updated in = regular case? How do you suggest that we proceed here? Should I look into the qemu code that might be at fault?(I=E2=80=99ll = try to upgrade my qemu to the latest and see if that fixes the issue). Regards, Sridhar=