Hello,

On Tue, 22 Jul 2025, Yoon Junghan wrote:

> Hello,
>  
> I'm currently using DPDK 20.11 with a ConnectX-7 NIC, and I'm trying to retrieve RX hardware timestamps using `rte_mbuf_dyn_rx_timestamp_register()`.

Does the application invoke 'rte_mbuf_dyn_rx_timestamp_register' on its own? If
yes, consider to replace this with invocations of APIs [1] (with field name [2])
and [3] (with flag name [4]). For an example, please refer to [5] and [6].

This is because, as per [7], the driver in question might 'register' the field
and the flag on its own, in response to 'DEV_RX_OFFLOAD_TIMESTAMP' request, so,
the user application should look up the field/flag, not 'register' it afresh.

If this does not help, then consider to clarify whether the timestamps are
accurate (and whether the flag is seen in the mbufs) when LRO is not enabled.

[1] https://doc.dpdk.org/api-20.11/rte__mbuf__dyn_8h.html#a6adf9b352a83e7d521fd6aa04e305b1c
[2] https://doc.dpdk.org/api-20.11/rte__mbuf__dyn_8h.html#a5159b2d34fa801d171ed0ccce451121b
[3] https://doc.dpdk.org/api-20.11/rte__mbuf__dyn_8h.html#a89d835027034f76a27eb2afe7987ae35
[4] https://doc.dpdk.org/api-20.11/rte__mbuf__dyn_8h.html#a831d7066c7193788351797a65186848a
[5] https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/d69724b1dcc69784bcef00b96597469b7f6e6207/app/test-pmd/util.c#L44
[6] https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/d69724b1dcc69784bcef00b96597469b7f6e6207/app/test-pmd/util.c#L60
[7] https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/d69724b1dcc69784bcef00b96597469b7f6e6207/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxq.c#L1743

Thank you.

>  
> When LRO is enabled, I notice that LROed mbufs seem to share identical timestamp values, and the timestamps are unexpectedly large or inconsistent. This raises the question of whether
> LRO is interfering with the correctness of the RX HW timestamps.
>  
> I’d appreciate any clarification on whether HW RX timestamping is reliable when LRO is enabled on this platform, or if LRO should be just disabled for accurate per-packet timestamping.
>  
> 
> Sincerely,
> Junghan Yoon
> 
>