From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C94326C for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 13:09:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f6-v6so13328817wmc.4 for ; Fri, 25 May 2018 04:09:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yIyRNXMOgRGbe4yw3ByfNPXBm0grfDjmRUoaagWk1OI=; b=GHwlyFn9oGInFHMwqSF7JuMl+bhKxSI/nQOEjWK6k4ltGPi7EZM7RF3lV03k0KoIa0 Y3ooJCfWVosTKjVw0HyPW8pTfqrjYAKsUqxbSyCersxEWPxKSFOgZy1X4kTfvPi5MfRW ChIdysLra8Nb6Cfw11QkvZ5jNUTojIPQlY4PrinntqLQc5FzwXT7kBtbbeKzfsfZODV6 lDONRxU+bAOG5z5iszV2khpPfGy1ZaKEJeEvOA9IYbIOWlHaKFsZFgxI3x21e2FMXIi7 J+TtGkXHJPoTYo6lGYvOOpM6s89n7QzepT/hEERYKGdMET9D79+/ES2lRFFt5MdUPV1K dt/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yIyRNXMOgRGbe4yw3ByfNPXBm0grfDjmRUoaagWk1OI=; b=ARXydN/WAxRb7qSko8JLrZicOId1pysnIzknyBRX7GvM+29OeRd/u5+Jm9FCw3uW4Q GKb/xvCu5GRy27gGRJVQOL0hftRAl9MGDYSnHM67i/13RJEDHTW+pMN4nyUUgbBf4V7g t4KVLuTxuUhsYUBiDj7YZ4KQTDaUi/9hoEiyJdTKxUtxcyUV9BBq/1FivvDR/24Ux1gy 9UDae14o8rA8qnBEmWXKKsC8n5dNCzJlppBw9nxA7WGxkIjy1hJuX39uLuwNSOAor6dL MBjyG76mj9SJcppdIaFiwb47BrPrpsBbOLq+mVRHEUKrjTJraoYeXergf0m0evzDk2Kf oYxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwdxdrnqkX7lQ0G45Xq0h9GEF6jZm6sBJWd1pga/VeLaRvB2QjC5 ubhFa6POMAc9Rutks67uM+E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrJFbvvqcd5rif88B/w56KQ1baj36ft8Z8oEQfLoJ8XsMh+hG6bt2/vOw2MM9oIzwc+aRaJvA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:638f:: with SMTP id s15-v6mr1379586lje.78.1527246567118; Fri, 25 May 2018 04:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from al ([2001:470:1f0b:1460:24e6:3555:bcec:4a36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p21-v6sm5471711lfc.70.2018.05.25.04.09.25 (version=TLS1_1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 25 May 2018 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 14:09:23 +0300 From: Alex Kiselev Message-ID: <458950148.20180525140923@gmail.com> To: "Xing, Beilei" , "users@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Qi Z" In-Reply-To: <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E0132161CCA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <351944790.20180522134228@gmail.com> <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E0132161CCA@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] problem with an additional MAC address on i40e X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2018 11:09:27 -0000 Hi Beilei. > What's the firmware version you used? Did you try testpmd? I've tried testpmd and didn't find any issues too. Therefore there=20 are some specific initialization steps that I do in my application=20 that cause the issue, or there are steps that I don't do, but I should. Also, I've figured out that the address 01:00:5E:00:00:12 has=20 nothing to do with my problem. The problem is a VRRP virtual MAC address=20 00:00:5E:00:01:0A itself. The problematic packets I can't receive=20 have source mac address 00:00:5E:00:01:0A and once that address is added=20 to an interface as an additional MAC I stop receiving them on that interfac= e. Could you please give me any ideas where should I start to find out what=20 prevents my application from receiving those packets? Thanks. > I tried testpmd with X710 on my side, the steps are: testpmd>> set fwd rxonly testpmd>> set verbose 1 testpmd>> start testpmd>> mac_addr add 0 00:00:5E:00:01:0A testpmd>> stop testpmd>> start > After that, packets with destination 01:00:5E:00:00:12 still can be recei= ved. > Best Regards > Beilei Xing >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alex Kiselev [mailto:kiselev99@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2018 6:42 PM >> To: users@dpdk.org; Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z >> >> Subject: problem with an additional MAC address on i40e >> Hi. >> I am facing an issue trying to receive packets destined to the MAC addre= ss >> ipv4_mcast_12 01:00:5E:00:00:12. >> The problem is that once I add to a port additional MAC address >> 00:00:5E:00:01:0A using rte_eth_dev_mac_addr_add(), the port stop >> receiving packets destinated to the address 01:00:5E:00:00:12. When there >> is no additinal mac on a port everything is ok. Also, there is no such i= ssue >> when I am using intel X520 nic (ixgbe), I am facing this behavior only w= ith >> X710 (i40e) intel NIC. >> DPDK ver dpdk-stable-17.11.1 >> -- >> Alex Kiselev. --=20 =D1 =F3=E2=E0=E6=E5=ED=E8=E5=EC, Alex mailto:kiselev99@gmail.com