RE: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] A question about the link status of the intel E810 nic can not be up?

["Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wangyunjian <wangyunjian@huawei.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 11:20 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; users@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>;
> Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Huangshaozhang <huangshaozhang@huawei.com>; dingxiaoxiong
> <dingxiaoxiong@huawei.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-users] A question about the link status of the intel
> E810 nic can not be up?
> 
> Hi, All:
> 
> I am using Intel E810 with DPDK v21.11 to create a dpdkbond but there is a
> probability that the failure will occur.
> 
> During the test, the bonding is repeatedly added and deleted. Sometimes, the
> link status of the NIC is Down. And if call ice_dev_set_link_up again, the link
> status of the NIC can be recovered.
> 
> Alternatively, the problem can be avoided by modifying the ice pmd driver.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c index
> 13a7a9702a..fcd22e20a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c
> @@ -3604,7 +3604,7 @@ ice_dev_start(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>         ice_dev_set_link_up(dev);
> 
>         /* Call get_link_info aq commond to enable/disable LSE */
> -       ice_link_update(dev, 0);
> +       ice_link_update(dev, 1);

This looks good to me, it's reasonable to wait for complete right after set link up as it is not in an link status change interrupt handling scenario.

We will try to reproduce this issue, meanwhile could you help on following below 2 things.

1. share the device ID / firmware version that you met this issue.
2. send a v2 with reworded title and commit log as a normal patch if you want to contribute.

Thanks
Qi

> 
>         pf->adapter_stopped = false;