From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qg0-f54.google.com (mail-qg0-f54.google.com [209.85.192.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7F2C61A for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 23:28:36 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b67so87679242qgb.1 for ; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9/pAZuvpGZt1ytdRnHMwK3SV2ldCAFbxMrp27VRPh/I=; b=CdGxo6+mxE5KHslj/MEfd7zviYQpjz4LMr3P4hS3bcpkzERoZZi9JN0j4fTLQvaJos iTxZ+XXlqgHZqC/Y+FlDoVIKa+li3fdPij7IgQRTlRsLUv19TDZNF8pgbxVBW2Tyc1s3 MavKJr7soR3J/4n+tIRz/ERt1GihZJ+e7Y0vlIlQCZBwNCyFpPKqqCkYagmc2hHTN3ye ShRD5UAcdEx8aTO2mzBReEQ0g4HIGeMDxVGbiI8QEQdLhxtDUWRti4vY+AFI5L5rsgPu CHZf7h2hO8++C6fEB/4SJMKRR0TOA4tw/0662e82aMlRNrzs6lAR1/MURE+9FJ+s4NwZ XrMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTAzFHKuPDPdb0HPVIV2Ke3YopBZrDq3MdkFb+7BkjD7pr3V+Zn//q0nemS2hEW4P5R X-Received: by 10.140.133.133 with SMTP id 127mr26815295qhf.42.1456007315693; Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfherb-2.local (pool-173-53-26-105.rcmdva.fios.verizon.net. [173.53.26.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g6sm3692719qgd.5.2016.02.20.14.28.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:28:35 -0800 (PST) To: Vincent JARDIN , "users@dpdk.org" References: <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com> <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com> From: Thomas F Herbert Message-ID: <56C8E891.6060907@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 17:28:33 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56C85B99.5060700@6wind.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:35:39 +0100 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 22:28:36 -0000 On 2/20/16 7:27 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Thomas, > >> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot >> bad today? > > can you check again? Its fixed. Thanks much! I forgot to mention but I had found the problem yesterday in integration build of ovs-opnfv. > > For 2 download: > > $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz > 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz > 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz > > tar tvzf is ok too. > > Thanks for the notice, > Vincent >