* Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
[not found] <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
@ 2016-02-20 12:27 ` Vincent JARDIN
2016-02-20 22:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
2016-02-22 0:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Vincent JARDIN @ 2016-02-20 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas F Herbert, users; +Cc: dev
Thomas,
> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
> bad today?
can you check again?
For 2 download:
$ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz
tar tvzf is ok too.
Thanks for the notice,
Vincent
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
2016-02-20 12:27 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem? Vincent JARDIN
@ 2016-02-20 22:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
2016-02-22 0:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas F Herbert @ 2016-02-20 22:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent JARDIN, users; +Cc: dev
On 2/20/16 7:27 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> Thomas,
>
>> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
>> bad today?
>
> can you check again?
Its fixed. Thanks much!
I forgot to mention but I had found the problem yesterday in integration
build of ovs-opnfv.
>
> For 2 download:
>
> $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz
>
> tar tvzf is ok too.
>
> Thanks for the notice,
> Vincent
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem?
2016-02-20 12:27 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem? Vincent JARDIN
2016-02-20 22:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
@ 2016-02-22 0:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas F Herbert @ 2016-02-22 0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent JARDIN, users; +Cc: dev
On 2/20/16 7:27 AM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
> Thomas,
>
>> I am not sure if anyone has noticed yet this but is the dpdk snapshot
>> bad today?
>
> can you check again?
Thanks, it was a networking problem. Maybe the shasums could be
published along with the snapshots?
>
> For 2 download:
>
> $ md5sum dpdk-2.2.0*gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0 (1).tar.gz
> 22e2fd68cd5504f43fe9a5a6fd6dd938 dpdk-2.2.0.tar.gz
>
> tar tvzf is ok too.
>
> Thanks for the notice,
> Vincent
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-22 0:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <56C77084.6090901@redhat.com>
2016-02-20 12:27 ` [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] snapshot for 2.2.0 problem? Vincent JARDIN
2016-02-20 22:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
2016-02-22 0:28 ` Thomas F Herbert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).