From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC3AA0032 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496BC4114E; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1C940141; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403A45805F3; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:58:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:58:20 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh=QYuY+HE3RlnK0 bJLQhn4wI5ojlLYGnQt0equfE0Yd4I=; b=UkBgm/O8SK9IvJ+5SaVGdgf2zA1kS 6aeH8o8hQvRZyE4m7DBOHRlZKvMlMoQSRX7Tq/BrMP3OM5OHJBAHyYUZR5p244q/ X1OayEXqlsF4xs1989RbDexyUlKy5VkoAl472dlq8bzWKFbhhAUUdzoLNxBFAMYJ CKjq90KrJsVNXoDfsAS3RsWz/49KKpjDM0Ao9wtD04/ozoKx86RSKOx4OaD3BYb8 nW9deAPOUbVFbD7Ue7UXeytvXdsWHmnLn3BhFgeGQoWqjb0T+GMJrYvI5Q0K2TUU 49m6k15MyeahP5NQFAHY55EOQKTESj5c/6EQHRyyxHrv0TwP6LXcgJTRw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=QYuY+H E3RlnK0bJLQhn4wI5ojlLYGnQt0equfE0Yd4I=; b=Z38ijcSzWkvKVVgk/cAtX3 GsUEVvE959S9cleoCB/8j2R1ESkUArjWhu1+/6FsL5+sGbf6y4Fivavgi0mHLe3m L9bsaHqq5EfLNHq3nQ8ZWUaGleMR/KCDPxMOoKz8O76TOKcvRJrvcLOY6HXQZ4lt iQxtT04x3gKdsaEAeSwRktaQdIjLU4LyKKA3fmnilTnuOPkvCt/cACb03okYV6Im JK7pXAJCc4lm0C/yjEtAjLuUnHgMvVQrj57RNgkAtMvCwnk9un4lVeFArRu02bVQ 8zTMGrrHnDUcxelrR/gsTyYtzul4eh2TLN8mNJzHQHFkriz1obKwdLTRnr+CtsxQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvuddrfedtgdeggecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhephffvufffkfgggfgtsehtufertddttd dvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhn jhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueejudehtdejgeeujefhteejge dtgfehueeuiedvuefhieejhfffudefgeejhfeknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptden ucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 15 Nov 2021 09:58:17 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, jerinj@marvell.com, rasland@nvidia.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, gakhil@marvell.com, bluca@debian.org, ktraynor@redhat.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, mdr@ashroe.eu, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, aconole@redhat.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com Subject: release schedule change proposal Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2021 15:58:15 +0100 Message-ID: <5786413.XMpytKYiJR@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org For the last 5 years, DPDK was doing 4 releases per year, in February, May, August and November (the LTS one): .02 .05 .08 .11 (LTS) This schedule has multiple issues: - clash with China's Spring Festival - too many rushes, impacting maintainers & testers - not much buffer, impacting proposal period I propose to switch to a new schedule with 3 releases per year: .03 .07 .11 (LTS) New LTS branch would start at the same time of the year as before. There would be one less intermediate release during spring/summer: .05 and .08 intermediate releases would become a single .07. I think it has almost no impact for the users. This change could be done starting next year. In details, this is how we could extend some milestones: ideal schedule so far (in 13 weeks): proposal deadline: 4 rc1 - API freeze: 5 rc2 - PMD features freeze: 2 rc3 - app features freeze: 1 rc4 - last chance to fix: 1 release: 0 proposed schedule (in 17 weeks): proposal deadline: 4 rc1 - API freeze: 7 rc2 - PMD features freeze: 3 rc3 - app features freeze: 1 rc4 - more fixes: 1 rc5 - last chance buffer: 1 release: 0 Opinions?