DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: E810 VLAN offload wrong behavior
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:12:22 +0400 (+04)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fed4086-f1c2-54de-4bb3-9d1e88a4707d@arknetworks.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002b01dbf4c6$54216be0$fc6443a0$@outsys.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5508 bytes --]

Hi Ernesto,

That's interesting. To be honest, I'm not an expert in this driver. So far it
does not seem the issue is with the specific Rx function, yet may be it pays to
temporarily change "#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86" to "#if 0" on line [1] in the original
source of 24.11.2 and rebuild? Just to make sure the Rx method is a don't care.

Thank you.

[1] https://github.com/DPDK/dpdk/blob/4c5634de9f933555bab9c64a533d3dca999071cd/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c#L3489

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, Ernesto Ruffini wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
> Thank you for your quick answer.
> I tried to apply the patch but got a compilation error:
>
> ../drivers/net/ice/ice_ethdev.c:5003:71: error: dereferencing pointer to
> incomplete type ‘const struct ci_rx_queue’
>   qrx_context_offset = QRX_CONTEXT(ICE_L2TSEL_QRX_CONTEXT_REG_IDX,
> rxq->reg_idx);
>
> So I did "git clone git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-net" and from there it
> compiled.
> Unfortunately it got consistent, but worse:
> The selected rx function is the same:
> ICE_DRIVER: ice_set_rx_function(): Using AVX2 OFFLOAD Vector Rx (port 0).
> But it now drops the VLAN, without signaling it, in all cases.
> With 1 queue:
>  ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
> With 4 queues:
>  ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>
> I double checked with plain 24.11.2 and indeed with just one queue it is
> still
>  ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>
> So I'm confident the lab environment is still good
>
> Thank you
> 	Ernesto
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 14:49
> To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
> Cc: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: E810 VLAN offload wrong behavior
>
> Hi Ernesto,
>
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, Ernesto Ruffini wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>> Thanks for the hint.
>> I ran testpmd with the suggested parameter, but I cannot find where
>> the function gets selected.
>> I attach the full log here.
>
> Thanks. The message to look for appears closer to the end of start sequence:
>> ICE_DRIVER: ice_set_rx_function(): Using AVX2 OFFLOAD Vector Rx (port 0).
>
> But before investigating the code of that Rx function, perhaps it pays to
> make sure patch [1] is applied. Everything is so recent that most likely it
> has not landed 24.11 release yet. Theoretically, the bug the patch is trying
> to fix has something to do with multi-queue and VLAN stripping. See if you
> can't apply the patch in 24.11 or rebuild from the current main of
> dpdk-next-net repository.
>
> Thank you.
>
> [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2025-June/320530.html
>
>> Thanks
>> 	Ernesto
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
>> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 02:04
>> To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
>> Cc: users@dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: E810 VLAN offload wrong behavior
>>
>> Hi Ernesto,
>>
>> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Ernesto Ruffini wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We found a strange behavior of the E810 VLAN offload.
>>>
>>> We are running DPDK 24.11.2 with ice driver 1.15.4, firmware 4.60 and
>>> COMMS DDP 1.3.46
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The NIC receives an IPv4/UDP packet inside VLAN 300.
>>>
>>> If we run dpdk-testpmd with a single queue, everything seems fine:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:4b:00.0 -c ffffff -n 8 -- -i
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> set verbose 5
>>>
>>> port stop 0
>>>
>>> port config 0 rx_offload vlan_strip on
>>>
>>> port start 0
>>>
>>> start
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> And the packet is correctly displayed:
>>>
>>>   src=08:02:03:04:05:06 - dst=00:1A:CA:01:00:96 - pool=mb_pool_0 -
>> type=0x0800 - length=142 - nb_segs=1 - VLAN tci=0x12c - hw ptype:
>> L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP  - sw ptype:
>>> L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP  - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
>>> Destination UDP port=5398 - Receive queue=0x0
>>>
>>>   ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
>>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> But if we use a different number of queues:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:4b:00.0 -c ffffff -n 8 -- -i --rxq=4 --txq=4
>>
>> It would be helpful to enable debug logs with EAL argument
>> --log-level='.*',8 so that one can see which 'rx_pkt_burst' method
>> gets selected by the driver.
>> Then one can inspect the implementation of that particular function to
>> see whether offloads are handled correctly.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> The VLAN is in fact removed, but there is no evidence of that:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>   src=08:02:03:04:05:06 - dst=00:1A:CA:01:00:96 - pool=mb_pool_0 -
>>> type=0x0800 - length=142 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xfae3080 - RSS
>>> queue=0x0 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP  - sw ptype:
>>> L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP  - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
>>> Destination UDP port=5398 - Receive queue=0x0
>>>
>>>   ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> There was a bug in some previous versions of DPDK about E810 and VLAN
>> offload, but it was fixed.
>>>
>>> Are we doing something wrong or is there a problem with the driver?
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>>                Ernesto
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14 16:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 11:28 Ernesto Ruffini
2025-07-14  0:03 ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-14  7:48   ` Ernesto Ruffini
2025-07-14 12:49     ` Ivan Malov
2025-07-14 13:50       ` Ernesto Ruffini
2025-07-14 16:12         ` Ivan Malov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5fed4086-f1c2-54de-4bb3-9d1e88a4707d@arknetworks.am \
    --to=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
    --cc=eruffini@outsys.org \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).