From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C563A04AC for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:34:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C9BFEB; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pg1-f179.google.com (mail-pg1-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A56F90 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:34:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pg1-f179.google.com with SMTP id i10so4225951pgk.1 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:34:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mywc1tnTolgjHaE05usMVlw/W9cdAOeDVpvbRyEn6tw=; b=XSyZmDz71AAkRky2PbQg+8aT+qkmAVs2vzZVOtCSh0oDUvDh7oo5MaV3zRE6dEb0eG yx8d1cLvK+v/g5MxjSSVznjRUnZ/BUdjXNU0pWhz6YRlXsrpm6S5FswG2DbAgF1pJ55K 4EgOxiM+PM7jrlNboS6KFeQy4V4nVuLTBoaScAu20a6GEp9G94k68pPi8ywm90qLkOz4 k9See4MD7vZpmypRnC/iwSxKNQ4qeWO6ZdVzw+pyJJiGuPySomgePtXNxnsGnSZCWtTy k8h2xnVqPdrqPuMBMkdh6LAz7nUwTCeJ8uvRcXSVWpRjVI2LFPxrKzB4kLhNsMKiCe9y 5R4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mywc1tnTolgjHaE05usMVlw/W9cdAOeDVpvbRyEn6tw=; b=mXTKGHZBgqI3s5F/BShJLASQNlqGndgsV3iuHhlv1e5ELgQJ2JLOMaCk11Yya+keUY WyEY4JsmTr0W26Kgrq4moAvKaBBiQ2a+3E1pFEhf0qRQg1BNVYTT088ubatUQyxVXsED w2ZLATBQ0yrdXnMC2+muBUv1f1mqfwooYF1rdvHv0/w6lVgA84pes6C/tA5lJESp3M2S ilBfLSsImWbrzS6cI4WDA4nb07fxuSf6MgH6USR8qs8d1GO+/3JEgUEjs4i/+XyI0Ivz TMg4ATuqpKa2Lqpg/12tR10gY5ExqPyfPxWz4SWs2IJIDffod8N+OG2oSv51Z601pxaK NoWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mLjKxOYbeXoZZM3s3Fq/5zbzPaUdjLEQzSUuQGhxtKtFqxI2I EOZivcyXnAIFUpdzoz8MzMJg5SyBi1eEBA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwj8hPSMtLxWtYhF8fDv2I2euQFrQx3/2MLeSIo8N3TGFC1Id7xKCIqIAZSsVlJXH+ZPj+wQQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:df10:: with SMTP id u16mr2851288pgg.437.1598258085562; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:34:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2406:3003:2005:20c2:dc8e:9dd9:52fe:25f9? ([2406:3003:2005:20c2:dc8e:9dd9:52fe:25f9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a6sm2467230pgt.70.2020.08.24.01.34.43 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 01:34:44 -0700 (PDT) To: users@dpdk.org From: Alireza Sanaee Message-ID: <767cf587-90b4-2eab-bd0d-667b862b50e8@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:34:42 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: [dpdk-users] Low throughput when pushing multiple priorities within a VLAN X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Dear all, I'd like to push two flows with two different priorities from a NIC to the network. If I use same priority for my flows, they'll be pushed at the line rate. However, when I pick two different VLAN priorities, throughput reduces drastically. Is there anything wrong with my NIC configuration? Thanks, Alireza