From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f176.google.com (mail-pf0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672D22BD3 for ; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 08:35:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p64so12860201pfb.1 for ; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:35:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=NyxgyX9821FZ4s3poKtNrx/+8AWqlw4Z1Wj2WDnR5gQ=; b=W1FdMJyRnprq8b/oRIo7WlVlSEKfkng8jjn63zkbrVjxHf7QDY8Sxm+8icfc5nUHUT qjeOH6RpJx67lJzviVr4OhcgU1pVgHZKbzLB5FdxG2S1zX11vBWhyUqRt4gkNLqbzXcn gmpTjsdUDKokcJJDOpkFTmewPXVAE8x9EXrZAloJm/3fX9GaO1ZrmiyXlC5XHA3pmYtw ylJo2VCfKCY09R4/2vGNiQoAmq8MwZEoc/2WsUjyqVwnXYbYr1U4LiGdzYPEl+K4Gllq kCMnCusvz3VQgnzrOZby3MSwxXQiOk/rh6vFFnXd3hx903kCPTloo76dS/U+n6LedAek 2Ckw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=NyxgyX9821FZ4s3poKtNrx/+8AWqlw4Z1Wj2WDnR5gQ=; b=RPw0ZnCwkbnFdvM11WsayvH6NptjSXiPYbYRm45V+FBgn4Foxm9LIDlpkrQxQ5NkCA 0BazbzFfXKfgLKjCXAAbsdtQt34593V55XSde0ee4YrpvgrO0S1g/XYy0M3whe4koCSp qEjxTbtwh9IKDsdqJeeqth/89abKX2XOXJeZZ7ZrUCU8aqDaC4UiCOq0/Um/qI88bMAE sr9KD6EdYQrO83d/KD6DkmGhQKZcb0zjNE9swtUbC37YgWGveMU1nAx7LsJ3fMJfiCap Tc78+nTWJxNbT2TeHPqf1xrd/FTT4VWtiHJqODKW6vYvnkT73SSDhRdPA2J+xEGQj32X EV9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousC8/C+GmT4NJxiBwztMtIHwbFiit49r3suQAwgBffLmMZnKzWeDx/aRzwU5IsmFw== X-Received: by 10.98.158.78 with SMTP id s75mr4173934pfd.137.1470810928590; Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:35:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([14.141.235.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm60787114pav.1.2016.08.09.23.35.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:35:27 -0700 (PDT) References: User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Anupam Kapoor To: Vaibhav Sood Cc: "users\@dpdk.org" In-reply-to: Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:05:26 +0530 Message-ID: <87lh05ku6p.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] [dpdk-dev] Running DPDK in a VM X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 06:35:29 -0000 >>>>> [2016-08-04T15:51:25+0530]: "Vaibhav Sood" (vaibhav-sood): ,----[ vaibhav-sood ] | I am looking at running DPDK in a VM, I would like to know if there | are any limitations when doing this in terms of any DPDK features that | do not work in a VM `---- crypto stuff might require some elbow grease. other than that, probably not much... --- thanks anupam