From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f67.google.com (mail-pa0-f67.google.com [209.85.220.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60457275D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:48:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pa0-f67.google.com with SMTP id hh10so9768884pac.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:48:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=opDG4NrRFEhdTr1coo+Mla4GrlbcaqBC5XPCEthJUJA=; b=UzO7+dB5UhigdRh6SgREne6ZgKFoVcqaQ5lAn4eMb9RwKeTOH5cCqfgVsmZopZ818/ kVnZdIgzD4CHh6Zg8YNDUHMMU7lT+78GOBe6Q+xmh3NWUroSLVbWXf4wyGwMujG+pqe9 NwHa2FDpdPY3jCOmMoE80btF4zNUbAhHgaf0JJKfQxDA7o+uNpO52cXxuDUkI1D3KNyA pYO01EaQM9O6Jmovf3FGgPI+Tiaugwe6otdSc67yAm54tWz71xqsOnlRppZ3vWiKxQ+v PVZL7YHJF609zLarjG+v2k6ihyPm7fDF30qrCiVGnFsjPVUs7u/K4Xas1yh2PgKPezEe qhLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=opDG4NrRFEhdTr1coo+Mla4GrlbcaqBC5XPCEthJUJA=; b=Vhmo98faJDEuAH0XYuv4aPT3i7bCvq6Pmy5zMFz1htkxflKKCl6CjWRdXC8TtsPHqb qNyxOHofA3mQ1NKUIRHxrJlsM3Z5KEWJhXkHh0VsZsXnALjkI5844GP6eMNPhglD1m9c xvcCWGt0O6o9GL4zZGN1YsGqQVHm8xiTov+8HMcd/Gyhs1bdODDFcamuOTNZPT04lqvo DoPbanDgySXao8lhqMyXofe/zdaBfo/3MLKwtTz4YYL9yNzcJaGi9PApdQV70bSoTjIf OJAR6QjEMjn0WTtSOVdtXpqCRvv3pRDHGvNTE5Y+ovcCK0Gub26cPcEtcgAAkUoyXLm9 yNaw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousOo+BnT3toeKlTIaKHCFgeQEjB+LOyB1FbPuvEd0oLX7U8Rpw7c76wr3bx+nba4A== X-Received: by 10.66.134.131 with SMTP id pk3mr51437596pab.90.1471949286695; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([14.141.235.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p64sm4675145pfd.11.2016.08.23.03.48.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 03:48:06 -0700 (PDT) References: <87r39fiybp.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: anupam kapoor To: Kapil Adhikesavalu Cc: users@dpdk.org In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:18:02 +0530 Message-ID: <87oa4jiwwt.fsf@fatcat.parallelwireless> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] DPDK port interrupt based link state notification X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:48:07 -0000 >>>>> [2016-08-23T16:08:02+0530]: "Kapil Adhikesavalu" (kapil-adhikesavalu): ,----[ kapil-adhikesavalu ] | So, will i be able to run "OVS enabled dpdk" along with one more dpdk app | which will handle just link notification alone; can this both be made to | run in parallel ? `---- probably not. multiple dpdk applications sharing same queues will cause problems e.g. weird lockups etc. --- thanks anupam