DPDK usage discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Subject: RE: E810 VLAN offload wrong behavior
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 16:49:15 +0400 (+04)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <89dacb09-664d-fb2b-ff4c-5fe76bf742dd@arknetworks.am> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <002201dbf493$baece9e0$30c6bda0$@outsys.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3415 bytes --]

Hi Ernesto,

On Mon, 14 Jul 2025, Ernesto Ruffini wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
> Thanks for the hint.
> I ran testpmd with the suggested parameter, but I cannot find where the
> function gets selected.
> I attach the full log here.

Thanks. The message to look for appears closer to the end of start sequence:
> ICE_DRIVER: ice_set_rx_function(): Using AVX2 OFFLOAD Vector Rx (port 0).

But before investigating the code of that Rx function, perhaps it pays to make
sure patch [1] is applied. Everything is so recent that most likely it has not
landed 24.11 release yet. Theoretically, the bug the patch is trying to fix has
something to do with multi-queue and VLAN stripping. See if you can't apply the
patch in 24.11 or rebuild from the current main of dpdk-next-net repository.

Thank you.

[1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2025-June/320530.html

> Thanks
> 	Ernesto
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ivan Malov <ivan.malov@arknetworks.am>
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2025 02:04
> To: Ernesto Ruffini <eruffini@outsys.org>
> Cc: users@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: E810 VLAN offload wrong behavior
>
> Hi Ernesto,
>
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Ernesto Ruffini wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We found a strange behavior of the E810 VLAN offload.
>>
>> We are running DPDK 24.11.2 with ice driver 1.15.4, firmware 4.60 and
>> COMMS DDP 1.3.46
>>
>>  
>>
>> The NIC receives an IPv4/UDP packet inside VLAN 300.
>>
>> If we run dpdk-testpmd with a single queue, everything seems fine:
>>
>>  
>>
>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:4b:00.0 -c ffffff -n 8 -- -i
>>
>>  
>>
>> set verbose 5
>>
>> port stop 0
>>
>> port config 0 rx_offload vlan_strip on
>>
>> port start 0
>>
>> start
>>
>>  
>>
>> And the packet is correctly displayed:
>>
>>   src=08:02:03:04:05:06 - dst=00:1A:CA:01:00:96 - pool=mb_pool_0 -
> type=0x0800 - length=142 - nb_segs=1 - VLAN tci=0x12c - hw ptype: L2_ETHER
> L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP  - sw ptype:
>> L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP  - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
>> Destination UDP port=5398 - Receive queue=0x0
>>
>>   ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_VLAN_STRIPPED
>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>
>>  
>>
>> But if we use a different number of queues:
>>
>>  
>>
>> dpdk-testpmd -a 0000:4b:00.0 -c ffffff -n 8 -- -i --rxq=4 --txq=4
>
> It would be helpful to enable debug logs with EAL argument
> --log-level='.*',8 so that one can see which 'rx_pkt_burst' method gets
> selected by the driver.
> Then one can inspect the implementation of that particular function to see
> whether offloads are handled correctly.
>
> Thank you.
>
>>
>>  
>>
>> The VLAN is in fact removed, but there is no evidence of that:
>>
>>  
>>
>>   src=08:02:03:04:05:06 - dst=00:1A:CA:01:00:96 - pool=mb_pool_0 -
>> type=0x0800 - length=142 - nb_segs=1 - RSS hash=0xfae3080 - RSS
>> queue=0x0 - hw ptype: L2_ETHER L3_IPV4_EXT_UNKNOWN L4_UDP  - sw ptype:
>> L2_ETHER L3_IPV4 L4_UDP  - l2_len=14 - l3_len=20 - l4_len=8 -
>> Destination UDP port=5398 - Receive queue=0x0
>>
>>   ol_flags: RTE_MBUF_F_RX_RSS_HASH RTE_MBUF_F_RX_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>> RTE_MBUF_F_RX_IP_CKSUM_GOOD RTE_MBUF_F_RX_OUTER_L4_CKSUM_GOOD
>>
>>  
>>
>> There was a bug in some previous versions of DPDK about E810 and VLAN
> offload, but it was fixed.
>>
>> Are we doing something wrong or is there a problem with the driver?
>>
>>  
>>
>> Thank you
>>
>>                Ernesto
>>
>>  
>>
>>
>>
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-07-14 12:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 11:28 Ernesto Ruffini
2025-07-14  0:03 ` Ivan Malov
     [not found]   ` <002201dbf493$baece9e0$30c6bda0$@outsys.org>
2025-07-14 12:49     ` Ivan Malov [this message]
2025-07-14 13:50       ` Ernesto Ruffini
2025-07-14 16:12         ` Ivan Malov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=89dacb09-664d-fb2b-ff4c-5fe76bf742dd@arknetworks.am \
    --to=ivan.malov@arknetworks.am \
    --cc=eruffini@outsys.org \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).