From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24B0A0350 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53ED1D170; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:57:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f41.google.com (mail-wr1-f41.google.com [209.85.221.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A621D163 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 14:57:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f41.google.com with SMTP id z2so1442723wrp.2 for ; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 05:57:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+E+nLf156FH+e+9/3TAN1+UAAPznqkQR47Zmp6DyJkc=; b=lPlX2uYe0NHZRBL4e21/J93baPiszDrdGDJoW4c0HldBpKDnbAA2F9wvfCl3WiNhA2 fC1igUXOEpmJdsqX1GD101maubGOwhJcUF//5344cXknAEqckx8M2f1seX0Mfua4o1Rn j27Nb5RxlCofKtipZA+kaaf0/vntSNxzQhMBUUj2p99b0qmDtU6XtNhG4YGpkii/7pZY 5cahYGjEW64/1nQ38stigGIUj1m/H1rPFxO6boKXh2chqsW5rqqRanmYbWb/ivl7+PUb L1PSomD8+8v2peWyBOkUsapWSj2ltZl35ewEGc3v+3bOjYL3Ftv7pIR7eTOZ8P3qpNHy sPIw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+E+nLf156FH+e+9/3TAN1+UAAPznqkQR47Zmp6DyJkc=; b=mROcEQVKxenzWUj9NGhvRJO4100PmwiINYc/B3zDvwzCn0jslkTF6wMp9X04E+WSDE WEr5UvJ7V0ext8uL+FWBeRhUmMeZDJlhW/01aAqr3B9ytz9Bgc2gPmPsY9laNcV9oXkO 8s+FE9FVXRn2SMgqIa/ARbzcwoAfe28YoqfbDEAtTe0KhMIpHHzYKtaTakHBX5oyGXWj Hs++rUlbz0ELvMZWoTtxAS3sdLI+IpUvM8AQLue2MYAJQRcmQcvxDBEqZ/CHkd7CDxiB O9Qs5IConTdOyhNAiMii5YJ7ybV1CNhKvKSCly2Ck/E9OVU3o4vLGhXYu4q9JauR54hl UTdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531fAfBoOPnpXJkpQTJGH0VyXv8NuaYBHgOKF5yviUnxOtZRHv+j 8WwjNtuDxzgSDem0/nmbSqwQ/jXsHfBwO2qJQIg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+9iHqwgaUajRtClbdSVkcdfhVcr0kMt+IDhD7ehKq+D1N6wZ/tjPegP+j8MkciQSBOsKbv03HsQvpUzeOOf0= X-Received: by 2002:adf:edc8:: with SMTP id v8mr26122967wro.125.1593608261225; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 05:57:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Cliff Burdick Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 05:57:29 -0700 Message-ID: To: David Aldrich Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Why is udp packet, sent by dpdk, received with zero'd payload? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Are you setting data_len and packet_len in the mbuf before sending? On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 03:23 David Aldrich wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem transmitting udp packets with dpdk-stable-18.11.8. I have > posted a question about it on stackoverflow: > > > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/62674596/why-is-udp-packet-sent-by-dpdk-received-with-zerod-payload > > I would be grateful for any comments either there or in this group please. > > Best regards > > David >