From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E267CA04AF for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534AC1C0B0; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:11:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883881C069 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 15:11:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id y3so1979013wrl.4 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=9DmJaf31KoE8QEprrWDYLnUGj4r3lTvUfLYeqblCtLc=; b=O8W8lI+PvfeJKxQ+pzhlZRcSWyr+LvD4w/SBlvz5dNjgyHBHrupD4/nb8Ol6pJl1mY DFBeuBzbPj/+1kcpmZOaX/WU4hkxQwhxmsm22mO0EdpPE6mfIBihzVEdCq4ewhPBXiwr jGYubVVHpB+STGwlWvsH0oxMR5ogUF1oRWZFw2MnS79J96L0ZwqhAA/QrCfY/hq89BwK 7H/+vOxznT1KRS8HXC0m92be00pzlzPvdPKYwyuGQXUvIiJMxYnXtdu0VLUB1aghTzpq kP5Hoj8OwkmYL5CrNiVGz/Yq4P7NYZZNQ+s2phGblbi2Zd8Q2aZpwGaRB0taarLMElQL QQGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9DmJaf31KoE8QEprrWDYLnUGj4r3lTvUfLYeqblCtLc=; b=JnyPszsbcm5NCnofbZHFSkzJDa/+oqodu3iGcJPLtOJLY1IJnG/xzoxSQRLyEMc0K7 yTdbOOqH7eX6v7efwAHNw6/U0OFAK3Rh1DmhB1xS7ujsNWS0Krtb5qmxrBabW2oOAZvu lu+8XjQL3K2feQsfF8itUspK90SQfKmhBSymC+k/1lBBwlh/rD1O70KIYISHIrA+rsef bhVwm+81+fyfNh7e7yUd1W3Uh9v9Sf+4ZMpoxZI3oHOLIi5rPtqNbgjKUXjLToY96T9t 7Ox8TjYatVngnuBaxgUFKm7nKwON7SYbXV/pmyCIccBGZ8KwIW6J3iRKD7LWhEs2EfuA B/9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532w+oSHt1AyyARsaBtcNy3N54TE0tD0sKj8r8F5Y0Y/dGK+7W5V IOsMklcdeYSn+RKY7cyDUQjotIK/3yAzT/ptoHs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw9JBpFOyNZaT8QO5gmW749FUX4vyIpVeTfOGP8c9yx9R0v99lBqX6namUwUGFfS9VfpVzy1PYBLOtaGiAkz1g= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f785:: with SMTP id q5mr3162911wrp.298.1597929111179; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:11:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2ff802b0-4b78-baa5-e4dc-519ac2ec43c9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2ff802b0-4b78-baa5-e4dc-519ac2ec43c9@gmail.com> From: Cliff Burdick Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 06:11:38 -0700 Message-ID: To: Alireza Sanaee Cc: users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Sending Packets on Multiple PMD ports with only 1 core. X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" There shouldn't be any problem doing that. Just pass a different port to the sending functions. On Thu, Aug 20, 2020, 03:51 Alireza Sanaee wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to send packet from multiple PMD port using one core, I'm > just wondering if this is practical at all or not. Has somebody had some > previous experiment with this? > > Thanks, > Alireza > >