From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <users-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C27FA0350
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Jul 2020 15:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E756F1BFBC;
	Wed,  1 Jul 2020 15:08:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com (mail-wr1-f43.google.com
 [209.85.221.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C171BFBA
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Jul 2020 15:08:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id h5so23744570wrc.7
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 01 Jul 2020 06:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=2gsCTSQq0sP2+QVObdCCRA3P0YqPW4Mnb1Og/Otuplo=;
 b=OPlgNaulNQpOyzKfjZvzBXKM8h3ULZr6dJlmCJl75lf29PUeX6BDYV05rXFgMzTlG7
 71owGF9lGUpuLQxuc/9vIJNy1PI+6YQAi6mP/8ow2jctxH+6wv6df6vBJssyB2253I0P
 nOsIenmVBETPfRrc4W0UrEaAfe5/ST5qqpH8xR49JxtXAFca/zqSTF5/szckPKZ2dU84
 dWvSgiaxGzw9K09IYe2PndYANXoKxVewng7yImPdE3b2zT2zaZ12FmlFsIBCILVJ0tAK
 wVPfei76BuG1GpDqnuYK1+6DnFX1RE+JTlJyv8KF8uHIybp9W2kyPEzNbAdIdLvyuA7j
 iIxA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=2gsCTSQq0sP2+QVObdCCRA3P0YqPW4Mnb1Og/Otuplo=;
 b=BtXOB37fAn6ShMOTUQlvenIqYPY9UvNxL+1RDlAJVBIMKwhSq42+w5d3/801HUXLo5
 Lf21cj14NYoVSFzoXXaGuaBJtAheZ4xRfQ/6vx4ojcWPBtDJNWXK1ampYWNwwsZN9QLM
 ZECeeT0JVAWJIRi6y2/vqm+etPSTj1j65PbE5TTaiymnKtEVNiD6MnT1F1Eb9q6ckAJj
 q0KyLHn41tEIao0Q7Qu7EvKXzKhISdFEv93l3ZTixyKJyVODNqkNvFw8eCZm1rpnben+
 pBBe7O/IK0TuMmCmJo6HAG3K90Z8LBX9wdSyZcKHflbEoUkIPnYjyUIXvaCRdN+38ZYC
 blAg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530WyBre7p5IrA9uCqx+FLX3JR7X/XiCcaa6iFQeIelq11qnONJ7
 yNV39aijDwAqd7QDadHr2q7xn4nF/fUeNx7Aa3iDgzaT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJySbATTQDmJRWtpFL20WfBCjMCTgvRKVcznYhHIFSXrxSpomL0AvX3mbrDuXy1lToVGovYDa6vhG+VjqVNwfFo=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:91e1:: with SMTP id 88mr20632570wri.89.1593608931154; 
 Wed, 01 Jul 2020 06:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAJK_iej33OUE7STkMY6+sPh75njDKrxQiG3SOyRt03zq=WMmJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+Gp1nYHoe429Kt-8yG-ZEtM2OU7gHEM33AyafW9jXa_rKgs3g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJK_iegoJpQOCJ5+wdCPBBBbFU9+i5MnDwgQPtLmdtkxboF8gA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJK_iegoJpQOCJ5+wdCPBBBbFU9+i5MnDwgQPtLmdtkxboF8gA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cliff Burdick <shaklee3@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2020 06:08:38 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+Gp1nb2mLJQqKHwytSbBFOj3bCb_QR-N77L1iKwimJ=sv84hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Aldrich <david.aldrich.ntml@gmail.com>
Cc: users <users@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] Why is udp packet, sent by dpdk,
 received with zero'd payload?
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "users" <users-bounces@dpdk.org>

Sorry, I didn't see those below, but it looks incorrect. Those numbers
should match if you're using a single segment. My guess is the 42 is
truncating it to the size of the udp header part only.


On Wed, Jul 1, 2020, 06:04 David Aldrich <david.aldrich.ntml@gmail.com>
wrote:

> > Are you setting data_len and packet_len in the mbuf before sending?
>>
>
>  Yes, and I believe that the mbuf dump and the tcpdump that I included
> show that these lengths are set correctly.  The problem is that udp payload
> is present but consists of all 0's.
>