From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <edin.burgh.2357@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com
 [209.85.214.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAE82C55
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:34:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id h199so6569787ith.1
 for <users@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=SXXoykOFdgL/ezRZ0JaPQQM+1wluXHJzK2AN3KLl36k=;
 b=IhT4sQKset7t2CQm/jyRcbfIY8Jdp6JJTou8KquJ1D4E98nZA4wi2iMUIN/fZU/aD6
 ek1+T0FWnFBsPT6GPky/ozRljOXURN7gkOdvL5GRiRfaH+xQvv52nalJYryRDHB9ltj4
 ryUYtWaX5kEq1i91jyLlGXG5QYFNCh3/gLor7GoaOtDBOZEut40dyxqlsjoC9b7o9mFa
 4f8Gj2r/psI56H+m1sEkUgr2wLjflOzFg63R4Xij3bF03LgIBEJxJ6uTIpzyzUmUthr7
 kudTYzfKh1gbLYh26iQxkOP+lA/qi0bGc8ho/SbbhfRV/gvN52qy5uuANe/kuqBj3a+K
 lFIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=SXXoykOFdgL/ezRZ0JaPQQM+1wluXHJzK2AN3KLl36k=;
 b=sxJNoGkgU3fi4m1TriS2pIS1SSOJQlTnF1zb0C1p9l616HnBy12sSZmdkzZvQ6UjkY
 ksV4i48oBW++P+33+tnLULw/39hunhbCr5/B3845yMMjBJfQ1EHvtwTfGUdP15j7YFt8
 Htnl7T7+yOyxWxieyiVQE2EO1PMNHKEo+KyxWrp9HxySTPN3Xt3cNjr/CmPo0CYKBinE
 bEWEZmSwjMnIxpFNcFsRc6NCdg/DHSeN7OEfc8oxcmkA5RB2wdZU01rohphc54amtLh+
 9Nxi2ivfSmPNf3RZe6nJQs0GcuyB+exwXTDlRAylCJwNEo1Nlt8PlBadyFR66FHdRIvU
 gpXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112arO7fjaQMeu8os25lWLNZgeUmP+uxNpR5ciqm+BhBdsHw6qS9
 Xvyd18EPczr+DAMlevw38lvaP874RA==
X-Received: by 10.36.29.140 with SMTP id 134mr1195381itj.121.1500496447000;
 Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:34:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.182.136 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.182.136 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170719133317.10b0306b@xeon-e3>
References: <CA+T+xs4gW3Swjy+tAVa=BugDp8JgW9SrUZOjgt3JADCL5G5oPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170719120428.0ab9c39e@xeon-e3>
 <CA+T+xs5kqSHJjjcEK508ckoWYH6S9-N6q8UcYg8SMoJeVFngkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170719133317.10b0306b@xeon-e3>
From: edin burgh <edin.burgh.2357@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:34:05 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+T+xs5HcP6Cv7iM_HaNWv3F=eN7+fvBBwV56zDH1fi68JEUoQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: users@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [dpdk-users] IOMMU support in UIO
X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK usage discussions <users.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/>
List-Post: <mailto:users@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/users>,
 <mailto:users-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:34:08 -0000

Ok, thanks for the clarification.

On Jul 19, 2017 13:33, "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 13:13:34 -0700
> edin burgh <edin.burgh.2357@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for the reply Stephen. Safety and protection issues aside, do
> > uio_pci_generic and igb_uio have the functionality to support IOMMU?
>
> No they dont use IOMMU. There was also a bug in some releases that if
> the IOMMU was enabled, it would block access via UIO.
>