From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F304CA0543 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:36:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87434021D; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:36:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (mail-pg1-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B9A400D6 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:36:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 82so2256651pgc.0 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:36:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fkqf/W++xLQwI63XoXlHMwcdM8lyj4MBPtDZWX+ZS8Y=; b=EJmpm+sFiYrfLtu8WlRhg9ya23NBEXsL7+rkzkqv1MH3ZlTAhVnr7gUzK/e8x8UqxM NJfslRlZ1HgaqfpWFY2PwN19DecntscIB71JTL06TG5SDaXaCxv0T7fuuYmN2mSr+VwO jUXCouEYTDNH6YbH8y4AX4ayH4j+pq2lpvrD4sVTODnGsxu0TIu5lVPmK8TXqHButneH 2S+kCz5BLRp7WEX/efW0iMIxfxu1JK1By9Wl9CTQkA6Kl22btZr8KrunoJ1zq18CO/1m pH1SFcXo1KtYhAInJ8U2C7Fibqm0Fz7lHUmkkpBSKqRi40THd4mALpahzPQpVjwj3zB6 typw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fkqf/W++xLQwI63XoXlHMwcdM8lyj4MBPtDZWX+ZS8Y=; b=qoGCsRNn5jnSKWjg6cBHwffr7+ge7TKdHqc8r/G743kKKmlsJu4lv2/3cZx36tMkbU 1x8skdDUS0xaBjlXckGj1F0KBnp0nMoqxSFa43XpjTA3MLl6IpKkTmBsUkrxNWdQ3Ufw VlCSrS9mw4x2d4Ihro9nfEoYZqml3In+c0sYQJ0gkIt2A2fx1t0HgBHEjvs0S4gQoulU mPEslOxE4pxdsAm0JdHHgdbZ8rPcD9dWP+LUSTCHX+hNQQYWvZ7QsT2CCxD2v27aszgN tbhoiuajTtg/u2QZKj+aHpOVTx7ElAExX/7+MIf5LTsyKG8oauB3CrRbdTnx9GyYxGSy bmpw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pmrCj2/I9VgSiuIUopjRMJrpz1MtSl1xg6BlBNZO9GQmyZ/cT1B 5Kh37rBbWG6NJpBhW11omhw6t9lfQNBzkEcwdmrHPDMbSNw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf7m5+wbWm1+XilHtIctvJBnPkUpS6xl1IvfKdslpnt6fBl46boG1vGDDfI4eqOfDyTgoULoIyi+tjXhL+4ChY8= X-Received: by 2002:a65:5509:0:b0:479:5832:5865 with SMTP id f9-20020a655509000000b0047958325865mr879815pgr.555.1671032172890; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 07:36:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Lazuardi Nasution Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 22:36:04 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: VLAN Based Flow Bifurcation with Multiqueue for Bonded OVS-DPDK To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012cee005efcb7fc8" X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org --00000000000012cee005efcb7fc8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi, Is it still possible to have multi queueing with flow bifurcation? I need some help to create a rule for having it with the following needs. 1. Filter is based on VLAN ID 2. Only some VLAN ID will go to PF, the rest will go VF (for ex. VF0) of each PF.. 3. All PFs (for ex. 2 PFs) is LACP bonded on the kernel 4. VF (for ex. VF0) of each PF is LACP bonded on OVS-DPDK Best regards. --00000000000012cee005efcb7fc8 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

Is it still possible to have multi = queueing with flow bifurcation? I need some help to create a rule for havin= g it with the following needs.

1. Filter is based = on VLAN ID
2. Only some VLAN ID will go to PF, the rest will go V= F (for ex. VF0) of each PF..
3. All PFs (for ex. 2 PFs) is LACP b= onded on the kernel
4. VF (for ex. VF0) of each PF is LACP bonded= on OVS-DPDK

Best regards.

--00000000000012cee005efcb7fc8--