From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309E2A0A02 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:31:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1496C1413F2; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:31:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (mail-io1-f50.google.com [209.85.166.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05A51413E8 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 18:31:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id q2so11096658iow.13 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cjpW9rwOzNyjxti5W/ufJa4hOPPIUYQ1DE7EWytaV/k=; b=WhmJVM1QyVzbW7ek14F35U/8/0r44GCj9uqrtgOrwGqlBfPAtWqZCgTP3dblD648lS 9uJzRwLVqWw83wdm6udOp2cGTZyrRV38c4qXR7KAW64+g4ClM54oF/gP6mcEf42YFAuy dzlQrfa9Ke78N6X5HmmRzMu2DYdEa5GPkpgAbhp9vTpuIIzqjteyNbTDdPajQ0tT/StI u0rlONp8ihDFGcYWb5YXJkaeZ7P9g0LFYzZ0A0rlwqSg8DsHvx9OzLRc6UVDDk/SQME2 upRcma68k/yVOpFfErgW0GQ/vuRvQJgxj+t/JLMeZWgJyVYIh9jHu7t6YaMePLBLzr9u sj+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cjpW9rwOzNyjxti5W/ufJa4hOPPIUYQ1DE7EWytaV/k=; b=kGoMlHQiMtVPRLjcbOZdJXbYG/4J/F3m7RatFFo9bFy5+RYLGPJQy+QDOAiO2WKYNw QM+8UiYdkPbUwVxtcHO1YsY0l8h/iYQRAJMisxQJusDpWct/cc8iUnytSR5wVUugrVP6 t5vgF6vVDe37A5cihOUaxE53jUGqtDMmLIBIvrzjlrtWCwrqVUPDueaLCVpPGSYj/321 QPwPE0gob0ZpXn26B59v4w3Ds/PPlC+A+7Rnthbqwjf0mdhAjT9usKiKlnLXabuQFLfa 2m41Ah2zUzEjyWxbK1M6FMayz/wvdCD/LplBt4WPG4NimsQFL+GEdoHzLRe9fAqXHufa 3RFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531apGjYxO2m0it6EeLF3iJ8BwPzenw040Lrm75tG9JUhMbqL78K 6m4WIN86VmwtIQGikpTffZdem+ThLzfwdsPPYbfNgvWmq8Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyrRgUavCvVXNIvRcQlyJkiFaOEV9W8L/qMQMch9TS3k8e4isyGDWk95clP7MzCrVfC1OsYAksgIuCx4uPrYic= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b2c3:: with SMTP id b186mr5781942iof.126.1610645467990; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:31:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: madhukar mythri Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 23:00:57 +0530 Message-ID: To: users@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-users] Does vmxnet3 PMD supports LSC=1 ? X-BeenThere: users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK usage discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: users-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "users" Hi, Does vmxnet3 PMD support LSC=1(i.e with interrupt mode) for link changes ? When i enable LSC=1 the functionality works fine, but, when pumping traffic i'm seeing increasing in CPU load on some cores which is running "eal-intr-thread" epoll_wait() function for more CPU-time. Actually, interrupt should come only when Link changes, but, we are seeing interrupt for each incoming Rx-packet and also a lot of spurious interrupts. ============= ~ # cat /proc/interrupts |grep igb 58: 1254293 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 1572864-edge igb_uio 59: 1278105 0 0 0 PCI-MSI 5767168-edge igb_uio ~ # cat /proc/irq/58/spurious count 98035 unhandled 0 last_unhandled 0 ms ~ # ============== Does anyone tried LSC=1 in vmxnet3 PMD based apps and faced similar issues ? If so, please let me know. Tried with DPDK-18.11, DPDK-19.11 and DPDK-20.05. Thanks, Madhukar.